2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsis.2019.101578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Business intelligence and analytics use, innovation ambidexterity, and firm performance: A dynamic capabilities perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
79
1
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 156 publications
1
79
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Chen, 2017). A study conducted in Slovenia found that the successful balancing of exploitative and exploratory innovation activities has positive effects on firm performance (Božič & Dimovski, 2019). Afacan Fındıklı et al (2015) found that strategic HR practices were partially effective on organizational innovation, which they divided as exploratory and exploitative.…”
Section: Ambidexteritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen, 2017). A study conducted in Slovenia found that the successful balancing of exploitative and exploratory innovation activities has positive effects on firm performance (Božič & Dimovski, 2019). Afacan Fındıklı et al (2015) found that strategic HR practices were partially effective on organizational innovation, which they divided as exploratory and exploitative.…”
Section: Ambidexteritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past decade, the vast amount of data collected in a variety of formats has been faster than ever before. It called for the advent of new technologies, culminating in hastening of technological developments that also incorporates the computational in the processing capabilities as well as the advancement of new AI techniques [1,5]. With these advances, firms are allowed to process vast quantities of data with AI by using the outcomes to broaden their purpose of new markets, products and services [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few researchers study the literature about AI from a managerial viewpoint, addressing the management of information [6,11,[20][21][22]; decision-making [3,23,24]; knowledge management [25]; and skills [5,[26][27][28][29]. This paper, therefore, to the best of our understanding, varies from those previously conducted by synthesizing to a systematic review of literature by examining the state of the correlation between AI and organizational strategy, a topic not included in the aforementioned articles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… the "absorption capacity" of an organization, defined as the ability to use new external information for its own purposes. [16] The analysis did not reveal the impact of the effectiveness of the organization and the industry in which it operates on the effectiveness of business intelligence implementation. This process largely depends on socio-psychological factors, such as the overall compatibility of staff with it technologies, their perception of changes in productivity caused by the use of business intelligence tools and common attitudes of employees.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…As indicated in [14], the introduction of business intelligence systems requires significant investment in technology and personnel, which significantly reduces the possibility of using this system in small business organizations. In large organizations, however, due to their size, it is necessary to take into account the lagging influence of various innovative activities on the company's performance [16]. In addition, a rapid change in business needs should cause a rapid change in the structure of business intelligence [15] to ensure its continuous evolution…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%