2002
DOI: 10.1108/09544780210413228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Business excellence in the public sector – a comparison of two sub‐groups with the “private” service sector

Abstract: Over the past decade, the public sector in the UK has made great effort in adopting business excellence thinking. To what extent have such practices taken root and what has been their impact? Presents some of the key results from a recent empirical study of 119 public sector organisations in North-East England. They show considerable strengths in some of the related HR practices, leadership issues, service delivery and quality matters. Equally, many of them face major challenges in adopting appropriate perform… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be argued that the public sector has a number of significant contextual differences that invalidate some of the private sector management models (Alford, 2002). On the other hand, it has been argued that the essential difference is simply the lack of market mechanisms or the state of monopoly in the public sector (Nielsen and Host, 2000) and many of the alleged differences have been used as excuses for not adopting and implementing models and practices that have demonstrably led to better performance in private sector services (Kim, 2002;Prabhu et al, 2002). The research in this paper seeks to examine and inform this debate in the context of service operations management.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be argued that the public sector has a number of significant contextual differences that invalidate some of the private sector management models (Alford, 2002). On the other hand, it has been argued that the essential difference is simply the lack of market mechanisms or the state of monopoly in the public sector (Nielsen and Host, 2000) and many of the alleged differences have been used as excuses for not adopting and implementing models and practices that have demonstrably led to better performance in private sector services (Kim, 2002;Prabhu et al, 2002). The research in this paper seeks to examine and inform this debate in the context of service operations management.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leadership practices have been found to be directly related to organizational performance (e.g. Heskett et al , 1994; Coughlan and Harbison, 1998; Fahy, 2000; Prabhu et al , 2002; Ozcelik et al , 2008). A significant role of leaders in achieving higher or excellent performance by their organization has also been found (Crocitto and Youssef, 2003; Crosby, 2002; Jabnoun and Rasasi, 2005).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mora and Villarreal (2001), Prabhu et al (2002) explain that an exclusive dependence on public funding does not incite institutions neither to diversify their funding sources, nor to improve management. As an example, William (2004) showed that the abrupt reduction of funds in 1981 pushed British universities to resort to managerial principles from private sector, especially the introduction of "Resource Allocation Model (RAM)" [2].…”
Section: Context Analysis and Research Agendamentioning
confidence: 99%