2006
DOI: 10.1177/0021943606291714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Business Communication Research: Past, Present, and Future

Abstract: Janus, the Roman mythological figure usually depicted as having two faces, one in the back of his head looking to the past and the other in the front looking toward the future, is an apt metaphor for the goals of the Publications Board of the Association for Business Communication's (ABC) special session at the 2005 annual meeting in Irvine, California. Titled "Business Communication Research: Past, Present, and Future," this session, very much like Janus, simultaneously looked to our research past and future … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of a common discipline for business communication graduate education may contribute to a lack of easily recognizable programs: no matter where the program is housed, programs where business communication can be studied are rarely titled Business Communication. These findings provide some support for Suchan and Charles' (2006) opinion that business communication would benefit from its own Ph.D. programs, but as they observe, "more than likely, though, we will have to do what we have done in the past: attract talented PhDs from other disciplines-English, speech communication, rhetoric, organizational communication" (Suchan & Charles, 2006, p. 397). The findings of the present study suggest that such attraction is occurring.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The lack of a common discipline for business communication graduate education may contribute to a lack of easily recognizable programs: no matter where the program is housed, programs where business communication can be studied are rarely titled Business Communication. These findings provide some support for Suchan and Charles' (2006) opinion that business communication would benefit from its own Ph.D. programs, but as they observe, "more than likely, though, we will have to do what we have done in the past: attract talented PhDs from other disciplines-English, speech communication, rhetoric, organizational communication" (Suchan & Charles, 2006, p. 397). The findings of the present study suggest that such attraction is occurring.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…In a similar manner, Suchan & Charles (2006) point out that business communication research has helped our understanding of what actually happens during communication in the business workplace. Using a variety of research methods, including ethnography, participant observation and case analysis, other researchers such as Yates & Orlikowski (1992), Cross (1994, 2001), Orlikowski & Yates (1994), Winsor (1996, 2003), Louhiala-Salminen (2002) and Gunnarsson (2009) have successfully explained some of the more complex organizational and situational constraints that operate on the construction, interpretation and use of business genres in real-life business contexts.…”
Section: English For Business Communicationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…NOTES 1. Contemplating the past, present, and future of business communication research, Janis Forman recognized the need to align the field more clearly with a business function, like corporate communication, which is becoming increasingly important in business organizations (Suchan & Charles, 2006). This suggestion echoes Argenti (1996), who, in an effort to define corporate communication as a discipline, distinguishes various subfunctions of corporate communication, including financial communication.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%