2019
DOI: 10.14295/transportes.v27i3.2039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bus passenger counts using Wi-Fi signals: some cautionary findings

Abstract: Analisa-se a viabilidade de pesquisas sobre usuários de ônibus com base na detecção de endereços MAC WiFi de dispositivos portáteis. A motivação para o estudo decorre da aparente contradição entre casos de sucesso publicados na literatura e resultados de experimentos de campo que realizamos. Requisitos para identificação adequada de passageiros de ônibus são usados como base para avaliar as capacidades do hardware e software de detecção comumente disponíveis. Mais especificamente, os intervalos de tempo decorr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the literature, the majority of studies examining the potential for tracking individual devices throughout a system (with Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or cellular connections) focus on ridership estimation (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11), with a handful of studies examining its potential for measuring other aspects of travel throughout the system such as comfort, route choice, and reliability (6,(12)(13)(14). Some of these studies report mixed results, and some offer specific words of caution about the potential pitfalls of Wi-Fi data, especially in relation to ridership estimation.…”
Section: Measuring Individual Journey Experience With Automated Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the literature, the majority of studies examining the potential for tracking individual devices throughout a system (with Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or cellular connections) focus on ridership estimation (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11), with a handful of studies examining its potential for measuring other aspects of travel throughout the system such as comfort, route choice, and reliability (6,(12)(13)(14). Some of these studies report mixed results, and some offer specific words of caution about the potential pitfalls of Wi-Fi data, especially in relation to ridership estimation.…”
Section: Measuring Individual Journey Experience With Automated Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these studies report mixed results, and some offer specific words of caution about the potential pitfalls of Wi-Fi data, especially in relation to ridership estimation. Paradeda et al (11) suggest that detection systems may be relatively inaccurate when compared with survey data, largely because of delays in detection of Wi-Fi signals from ''off the shelf components used with open source software.'' Ryu et al (8) show more promising accuracy on a small scale using a sliding window detection algorithm.…”
Section: Measuring Individual Journey Experience With Automated Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of studies examining the potential of tracking individual devices throughout a system (with WiFi, Bluetooth, or cellular connections) focus on ridership estimation (Aguiléra et al, 2014, Hakegard et al, 2018, Myrvoll et al, 2017, Nitti et al, 2020, Paradeda et al, 2019, Ryu et al, 2020, Wang et al, 2011, with a handful of studies examining its potential for measuring other aspects of travel throughout the system such as comfort, route choice, and reliability (Aguiléra et al, 2014, Asim et al, 2022, Gu et al, 2021. Some of these studies report mixed results, and some offer specific words of caution about the potential pitfalls of WiFi data, especially around ridership estimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these studies report mixed results, and some offer specific words of caution about the potential pitfalls of WiFi data, especially around ridership estimation. Paradeda et al (2019) suggest that detection systems may be relatively inaccurate when compared with survey data, while Ryu et al (2020) show more promising accuracy on a small scale using a sliding window detection algorithm. In an attempt to reconstruct passenger trajectories throughout a subway system, Gu et al (2021) estimated that only 5% of trajectories could be completely identified from origin to destination in the Shanghai metro system without the use of additional analysis to fill in the gaps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the parameters that .ilter the packets coming from smartphones inside the bus from outside noise are con.igured empirically, usually by setting arbitrary thresholds. This makes the application of such approaches problematic due to the complexity of estimating such limits and possible collateral effects (Oransirikul et al, 2019;Paradeda et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%