2006
DOI: 10.1080/15472450600981009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bus Arrival Time Prediction Using Support Vector Machines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
130
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 229 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
130
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The previous studies also prove that situation 1 is more popular (Shalaby, Farhan 2004;Zheng et al 2012;Yu et al 2006Yu et al , 2010Yu et al , 2011. However, situation 2 has two unique advantages:…”
Section: Detection Point Standardizationmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The previous studies also prove that situation 1 is more popular (Shalaby, Farhan 2004;Zheng et al 2012;Yu et al 2006Yu et al , 2010Yu et al , 2011. However, situation 2 has two unique advantages:…”
Section: Detection Point Standardizationmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…It can even be used in times of training data shortage. Yu et al (2006) built a SVM model and examined the feasibility and applicability of SVM in bus travel time forecasting. Later, Zheng et al (2012) developed a multiple-stop prediction model and attempted to predict bus arrival times of the following multiple stops.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, model complexity and high dependency to a lot of data are the most significant disadvantages of them. Neural networks such as MLP, RBF and TDNN (Bin, 2006, Nagare, 2012, K Nearest Neighborhood (Chang, 2012) and SVM models (Castro-Neto, 2009) are among the most common nonparametric prediction methods that have been used more often for traffic flow prediction.…”
Section: Nonparametric Prediction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been many studies on the prediction of travel times using techniques such as historical and real-time methods [1][2][3][4] , statistical methods [5][6][7] , machine learning methods [8][9][10][11] and model based methods [12][13][14][15] . Most of these studies were developed or tested for lane-disciplined and homogeneous traffic conditions.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bin et al 8 used SVM to predict bus arrival time for four patterns, viz. peak traffic on sunny day (SP), offpeak traffic on sunny day (SO), peak traffic on rainy day (RP) and off-peak traffic on rainy day (RO).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%