2019
DOI: 10.1111/papr.12831
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Burst and Tonic Spinal Cord Stimulation Both Activate Spinal GABAergic Mechanisms to Attenuate Pain in a Rat Model of Chronic Neuropathic Pain

Abstract: BackgroundExperimental and clinical studies have shown that tonic spinal cord stimulation (SCS) releases gamma‐aminobutyric acid (GABA) in the spinal dorsal horn. Recently, it was suggested that burst SCS does not act via spinal GABAergic mechanisms. Therefore, we studied spinal GABA release during burst and tonic SCS, both anatomically and pharmacologically, in a well‐established chronic neuropathic pain model.MethodsAnimals underwent partial sciatic nerve ligation (PSNL). Quantitative immunohistochemical (IH… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
37
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The separate or combined blockade of GABA or Glycine transmission revealed a complex involvement of inhibitory circuits in the effects of GON stimulation on vibrissal responses, and strongly suggests that the synaptic weight of GABAergic and Glycinergic inputs modulating GON and vibrissal inputs is not the same, under either control or CCI-IoN conditions. This complexity was compounded by the uncontrolled degree of penetration of the drugs, a variable in the design intended to mimic the effects of applying agonists or antagonists of inhibitory neurotransmitters intrathecally or intracisternally in basic research [106][107][108][109][110] and clinical settings [111,112]. Yet, our findings may be supported by known local connections in the dorsal horn and provide new data on the possible involvement of these circuits under conditions of neuropathic pain.…”
Section: Inhibitory Transmission In Tcc and Its Involvement In The Efmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The separate or combined blockade of GABA or Glycine transmission revealed a complex involvement of inhibitory circuits in the effects of GON stimulation on vibrissal responses, and strongly suggests that the synaptic weight of GABAergic and Glycinergic inputs modulating GON and vibrissal inputs is not the same, under either control or CCI-IoN conditions. This complexity was compounded by the uncontrolled degree of penetration of the drugs, a variable in the design intended to mimic the effects of applying agonists or antagonists of inhibitory neurotransmitters intrathecally or intracisternally in basic research [106][107][108][109][110] and clinical settings [111,112]. Yet, our findings may be supported by known local connections in the dorsal horn and provide new data on the possible involvement of these circuits under conditions of neuropathic pain.…”
Section: Inhibitory Transmission In Tcc and Its Involvement In The Efmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The separate or combined blockade of GABA or Glycine transmission revealed a complex involvement of inhibitory circuits in the effects of GON stimulation on vibrissal responses, and strongly suggests that the synaptic weight of GABAergic and Glycinergic inputs modulating GON and vibrissal inputs is not the same, under either control or CCI-IoN conditions. This complexity was compounded by the uncontrolled degree of penetration of the drugs, a variable in the design intended to mimic the effects of applying agonists or antagonists of inhibitory neurotransmitters intrathecally or intracisternally in both basic research [ 109 113 ] and clinical settings [ 114 , 115 ]. Yet, our findings may be supported by known local connections in the dorsal horn and provide new data on the possible involvement of these circuits under conditions of neuropathic pain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The separate or combined blockade of GABA or Glycine transmission revealed a complex involvement of inhibitory circuits in the effects of GON stimulation on vibrissal responses, and strongly suggests that the synaptic weight of GABAergic and Glycinergic inputs modulating GON and vibrissal inputs is not the same, under either control or CCI-IoN conditions. This complexity was compounded by the uncontrolled degree of penetration of the drugs, a variable in the design intended to mimic the effects of applying agonists or antagonists of inhibitory neurotransmitters intrathecally or intracisternally in both basic research [109][110][111][112][113] and clinical settings [114,115]. Yet, our ndings may be supported by known local connections in the dorsal horn and provide new data on the possible involvement of these circuits under conditions of neuropathic pain.…”
Section: Responses In Tcc To Gon and Vibrissal Stimulation Are Differmentioning
confidence: 93%