“…Although many authors agree with the advantages of gas over fluid in terms of quality of vision and technical comfort [5, 8, 10, 11, 13, 18, 19, 22, 23], we have no objective means to quantify the potential advantages of improved visualization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adequate visualization of joint structures is usually achieved, although obscurations by the mobilization of the synovial villi, haemorrhage and detached particles during ACL reconstruction may cause additional surgical difficulty. An alternative to minimize this inconvenience is to use a gas to distend the joint [22], which remains a very rare practice among orthopaedic surgeons. However, since the 1980s, authors who compared gas and fluid arthroscopy realized the superiority of gas, providing more realistic visualization (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) and avoiding reduced vision due to bleeding, synovial villi and floating debris (Fig. 3) [5, 8, 10, 11, 13, 18, 19, 22, 23]. For Henche [8]: “The advantage of gas filling lies in the natural appearance of the interior of the knee joint.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Henche [8]: “The advantage of gas filling lies in the natural appearance of the interior of the knee joint. There is always a clear view, and if bleeding of the synovial membrane occurs it does not blur the image.” At the same time, for Eriksson and Sebik [5], advantages of gas medium are “improved clarity and the ability to make a more realistic assessment of joint surface pathology” and for Johnson [11] an “increase field of vision.” More recently, Strobel [22] mentioned “good visibility, good depth of field and does not disturb the synovial villi” to describe gas advantages in a rigorous comparison between gas and fluid arthroscopy (Fig. 1).…”
Low-pressure CO2 knee joint insufflation proved to be a safe technique capable of improving surgical comfort compared with the use of fluid alone. The CO2 blood diffusion measured by end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring during ACL arthroscopic reconstruction was similar with or without gas insufflation.
“…Although many authors agree with the advantages of gas over fluid in terms of quality of vision and technical comfort [5, 8, 10, 11, 13, 18, 19, 22, 23], we have no objective means to quantify the potential advantages of improved visualization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adequate visualization of joint structures is usually achieved, although obscurations by the mobilization of the synovial villi, haemorrhage and detached particles during ACL reconstruction may cause additional surgical difficulty. An alternative to minimize this inconvenience is to use a gas to distend the joint [22], which remains a very rare practice among orthopaedic surgeons. However, since the 1980s, authors who compared gas and fluid arthroscopy realized the superiority of gas, providing more realistic visualization (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) and avoiding reduced vision due to bleeding, synovial villi and floating debris (Fig. 3) [5, 8, 10, 11, 13, 18, 19, 22, 23]. For Henche [8]: “The advantage of gas filling lies in the natural appearance of the interior of the knee joint.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Henche [8]: “The advantage of gas filling lies in the natural appearance of the interior of the knee joint. There is always a clear view, and if bleeding of the synovial membrane occurs it does not blur the image.” At the same time, for Eriksson and Sebik [5], advantages of gas medium are “improved clarity and the ability to make a more realistic assessment of joint surface pathology” and for Johnson [11] an “increase field of vision.” More recently, Strobel [22] mentioned “good visibility, good depth of field and does not disturb the synovial villi” to describe gas advantages in a rigorous comparison between gas and fluid arthroscopy (Fig. 1).…”
Low-pressure CO2 knee joint insufflation proved to be a safe technique capable of improving surgical comfort compared with the use of fluid alone. The CO2 blood diffusion measured by end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring during ACL arthroscopic reconstruction was similar with or without gas insufflation.
“…Recent interest has also been brought to tears of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus at the meniscocapsular junction in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)–deficient knees, otherwise known as ramp lesions 14 . These lesions have a reported incidence as high as 40% in patients with concomitant ACL tears, as the medial meniscus plays a significant role in the prevention of anterior tibial translation in the setting of ACL deficiency 15,16 .…”
Musculoskeletal injuries are common in American football, with an incidence ranging from approximately 10 to 35 per 1000 playing hours. Injuries occur more commonly in games than in practice. Although several studies have analyzed specific injury types in football, this review aims to describe the most common knee injuries sustained by American football players and to review the existing literature pertaining to the radiologic findings used in the diagnosis of these injuries.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.