2010
DOI: 10.3354/meps08639
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Burrowing deeper into benthic nitrogen cycling: the impact of bioturbation on nitrogen fixation coupled to sulfate reduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
101
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
10
101
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Many physical and biological factors influence the level of nutrient enrichment, as well as the type and severity of consequences to an ecosystem's functioning. Nutrient cycling and efflux from the sediments are influenced by the sedimentary environment (Blackburn and Henriksen, 1983;Glud, 2008;Santos et al, 2012), benthic macrofauna (Bertics et al, 2010;Laverock et al, 2011), and macrophyte communities (Kenworthy et al, 1982). Our results show that primary consideration should be given to benthic macrofauna and sediment properties when estimating potential enrichment levels of experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Many physical and biological factors influence the level of nutrient enrichment, as well as the type and severity of consequences to an ecosystem's functioning. Nutrient cycling and efflux from the sediments are influenced by the sedimentary environment (Blackburn and Henriksen, 1983;Glud, 2008;Santos et al, 2012), benthic macrofauna (Bertics et al, 2010;Laverock et al, 2011), and macrophyte communities (Kenworthy et al, 1982). Our results show that primary consideration should be given to benthic macrofauna and sediment properties when estimating potential enrichment levels of experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The distribution of N 2 fixation rates were generally similar to nitrification -with much lower rates (8-45 nmol cm −3 yr −1 ) at site 4A -again consistent with overall lower cell abundance (Zhao and Jørgensen, 2015). These rates are 2-3 orders of magnitude lower than rates measured in coastal and estuarine sediments (e.g., Bertics et al, 2010;Rao and Charette, 2012;Joye and Paerl, 1993), although still much higher than rates measured in studies of N 2 fixation in oligotrophic water column (e.g., Montoya et al, 2004;Capone et al, 2005). Overall, North Pond sediments appear to harbor a spectrum of microbially mediated N transformations, with rates lower than those found in most sedimentary systems, yet still generally higher than those observed in overlying oligotrophic waters.…”
Section: Model-predicted Values Of δ 15 N Ntr : Implications For N Somentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Based on our findings, a naïve hypothesis would be that the frequency of physical disturbance (here, bottom fishing) is less important for biogeochemical cycling in cohesive sediments than it is in noncohesive sediments, but in the absence of a comparable fully functional ecosystem such a conclusion is premature (Thrush and Dayton 2002). Indeed, even a low frequency of disturbance can cause significant changes to the biotic and abiotic components of the system and it is possible that intensive fishing disturbance can cause a reduction of [NO 3 -N] that relates to over-mobilisation of sediment, increased microbial activity, and net loss of N from the sediments (Bertics et al 2010, Laverock et al 2011). Whilst it is clear that non-cohesive sediment communities are vulnerable to changes in the frequency of fishing, even though the fishing pressure is relatively low, near-bed current flows and the permeability of the sediment profile mean that organic carbon cycling is already rapid (Rocha 2008), making it difficult to assess how nutrient sediment-water exchange is affected as communities are modified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%