2014
DOI: 10.1080/03949370.2014.892538
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Burrowing activity of the invasive red swamp crayfish,Procambarus clarkii, in fishponds of La Brenne (France)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, due to the simulation of similar conditions (no vegetation, presence of water, 50-50 sex ration, comparable densities), results presented in this study are likely to be expected under natural conditions. However, the overall low level of variation (only two types of burrows) was likely due to the constant water level (Holdich and Lowery 1988;Ilhéu et al 2003) and the experimental setup, but is in agreement with previous studies that also reported complex and simple burrow structures (Correia and Ferreira 1995;Ilhéu and Bernardo 1996;Gherardi et al 2002) with similar burrow opening diameters (Souty-Grosset et al 2014), with a burrow depth ranging from 0.28 to 0.58 m (Portugal: Correia and Ferreira 1995). In contrast to the horizontally burrows constructed at 0-20 cm below the water level, previously described burrows showed a simpler morphology, with usually one opening at a distance of 0-10 cm above the water surface enlarging in a tunnel with a terminal chamber, potentially with muddy plugs or a chimney reaching up over the burrow opening.…”
Section: Structure Of Burrowssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, due to the simulation of similar conditions (no vegetation, presence of water, 50-50 sex ration, comparable densities), results presented in this study are likely to be expected under natural conditions. However, the overall low level of variation (only two types of burrows) was likely due to the constant water level (Holdich and Lowery 1988;Ilhéu et al 2003) and the experimental setup, but is in agreement with previous studies that also reported complex and simple burrow structures (Correia and Ferreira 1995;Ilhéu and Bernardo 1996;Gherardi et al 2002) with similar burrow opening diameters (Souty-Grosset et al 2014), with a burrow depth ranging from 0.28 to 0.58 m (Portugal: Correia and Ferreira 1995). In contrast to the horizontally burrows constructed at 0-20 cm below the water level, previously described burrows showed a simpler morphology, with usually one opening at a distance of 0-10 cm above the water surface enlarging in a tunnel with a terminal chamber, potentially with muddy plugs or a chimney reaching up over the burrow opening.…”
Section: Structure Of Burrowssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This becomes obvious, as (i) shelter (i.e. rocks, structure) would provide additional cover and reduce burrowing activity, (ii) too small or large particles would increase the difficulty of burrow-construction (Barbaresi et al 2004;Solari et al 2016), and (iii) vegetation (and the roots within the sediment) affect the porosity of the sediment (Ilhéu et al 2003;Souty-Grosset et al 2014). Additionally, Kouba et al (2016) showed that P. clarkii is capable of constructing different burrow structures in response to environmental changes, directly increasing its survivability.…”
Section: Structure Of Burrowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Also, it seems that the water table is often below the bottom of burrows at drying localities, e.g. in the case of P. clarkii, which frequently reproduces under these conditions (McClain & Romaire, 2004;Souty-Grosset et al, 2014). Crayfish abilities to reach the water table under laboratory conditions are species-dependent (Bovbjerg, 1970;Dyer, Worthington, & Brewer, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%