Burnt to a crisp? Understanding drivers of burnout amongst New Zealand workers

Abstract

PurposeJob burnout is a popular topic for researchers and a pressing issue for employees and employers. However, the most popular measure has become widely critiqued, and a new construct – the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT) – has been offered as a better way to assess burnout.Design/methodology/approachThe study uses data from 1,022 employees across a wide range of occupations, sectors and industries. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and odds ratio calculations are explored.FindingsThe present psychometric properties of the BAT construct are supported. Overall, 11.1% of employees met the high burnt-out risk threshold. Determinants of burnt-out risk were explored, with significant findings from high perceptions of organizational support, large firm-size, young age and long work hours found. No gender differences. The odds ratio provides greater insights into the risks associated with factors, especially working 55+ hours/week, which resulted in 580% higher risk of burnt-out risk.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings highlight the danger of burnt-out risk and provide a useful benchmark for those exploring the burnt-out risk rate.Originality/valueThe BAT has not been tested in New Zealand across a sample of employees. Given the large size and breadth of employees, this provides useful generalizability to the BAT-NZ. The determinants tested here are all unique to the literature and provide new insights.

The Importance of Intergenerational Leadership Praxes and Availability of Key Information for Older Employee Burnout and Engagement in the Context of Firm Size

“…Intergenerational leadership praxes negatively impact older employees’ emotional burnout symptoms, but this impact is much stronger in large companies. This is in line with Haar’s (2021) claim that employees working in larger-sized firms will report higher levels of burnout risk and that the firm size could be a determinant of burnout rates, reflecting that larger-sized firms operate in more competitive environments, which can create additional pressure on employees.…”

“…Stress and burnout involve both physiological and psychological responses to environmental stressors. This affects the functioning of the autonomic nervous system, which is the primary response system for regulating the body’s physiological reaction to stress ( Haar, 2021 ).…”

“…Heading off these downturns in productivity and wellbeing, a priority prior to the global pandemic, became critical. Physical symptoms of burnout have a positive impact on emotional symptoms of burnout among older employees ( Pluta and Rudawska, 2021 ), which have a negative effect on an employee’s wellbeing, quality of worklife, health, productivity, and performance ( Lichtenthaler and Fischbach, 2016a ; Haar, 2021 ). Physical burnout symptoms, manifested in lack of energy or chronic fatigue, have a positive effect on emotional burnout symptoms, which could be manifested in depression.…”

Enhancing the employee experience: exploring a global positive climate to influence key employee outcomes

“…Data were collected in NZ in late 2021 using a Cint survey panel, who provide access to a large database of potential NZ respondents (for more details see Haar, 2022). The qualifiers in the present study were: (1) being in paid employment; (2) being aged 18 years and over; and (3) working a minimum 20 h/week.…”

A moderated mediation model of smart-device use: work–family conflict and well-being by age

“…Data was gathered using a CINT survey panel (for more details see Haar, 2022) in December 2020, using a representative employee sample across New Zealand. Full ethics was granted for the study.…”