2020
DOI: 10.1142/s0219199720500121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Burnside rings for Real 2-representation theory: The linear theory

Abstract: This paper is a fundamental study of the Real 2-representation theory of 2-groups. It also contains many new results in the ordinary (non-Real) case. Our framework relies on a 2-equivariant Morita bicategory, where a novel construction of induction is introduced. We identify the Grothendieck ring of Real 2-representations as a Real variant of the Burnside ring of the fundamental group of the 2-group and study the Real categorical character theory. This paper unifies two previous lines of inquiry, the approach … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We work in the framework of Real 2-representation theory, as developed by the second author [44,51], in which a 𝐶 2 -graded finite group Ĝ acts coherently on a ℂ-linear category  by functors 𝜌(𝜎) ∶  → , 𝜎 ∈ Ĝ, which are linear and covariant if 𝜋(𝜎) = 1 and, depending on the setting, antilinear and covariant or linear and contravariant if 𝜋(𝜎) = −1. In the context of matrix factorizations, a (possibly antilinear) action of Ĝ on 𝑅 for which the potential satisfies condition (1) or (3) defines a Real 2-representation on MF(𝑅, 𝑤); see Lemmas 3.2 and 5.6.…”
Section: Strategy Of Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We work in the framework of Real 2-representation theory, as developed by the second author [44,51], in which a 𝐶 2 -graded finite group Ĝ acts coherently on a ℂ-linear category  by functors 𝜌(𝜎) ∶  → , 𝜎 ∈ Ĝ, which are linear and covariant if 𝜋(𝜎) = 1 and, depending on the setting, antilinear and covariant or linear and contravariant if 𝜋(𝜎) = −1. In the context of matrix factorizations, a (possibly antilinear) action of Ĝ on 𝑅 for which the potential satisfies condition (1) or (3) defines a Real 2-representation on MF(𝑅, 𝑤); see Lemmas 3.2 and 5.6.…”
Section: Strategy Of Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We work in the framework of Real 2‐representation theory, as developed by the second author [44, 51], in which a C2$C_2$‐graded finite group Ĝ$\hat{G}$ acts coherently on a C$\mathbb {C}$‐linear category C$\mathcal {C}$ by functors ρfalse(σfalse):scriptCscriptC$\rho (\sigma ): \mathcal {C}\rightarrow \mathcal {C}$, σtrueĜ$\sigma \in \hat{G}$, which are linear and covariant if πfalse(σfalse)=1$\pi (\sigma )=1$ and, depending on the setting, antilinear and covariant or linear and contravariant if πfalse(σfalse)=1$\pi (\sigma )=-1$. In the context of matrix factorizations, a (possibly antilinear) action of Ĝ$\hat{G}$ on R$R$ for which the potential satisfies condition () or () defines a Real 2‐representation on MFfalse(R,wfalse)${\rm MF}(R,w)$; see Lemmas 3.2 and 5.6.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strategy of proof. We work in the framework of Real 2-representation theory, as developed by the second author [You21], [RY21], in which a C 2 -graded finite group Ĝ acts coherently on a C-linear category C by functors ρ(σ) : C → C, σ ∈ Ĝ, which are linear and covariant if π(σ) = 1 and, depending on the setting, antilinear and covariant or linear and contravariant if π(σ) = −1. In particular, a (possibly antilinear) action of Ĝ on R for which the potential satisfies condition (1) or (2) defines a Real 2-representation on MF(R, w); see Lemmas 3.2 and 5.6.…”
Section: Theorem 11 ([Knö87]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is interesting that the Real 2-representation theory of C 2 -graded groups [25,22] is as developed as its 1-counterpart, the topic of the present paper. In 2representation theory, the step from split to general C 2 -graded groups goes back to Hahn [12], who extends hermitian Morita theory from algebras with involution to algebras with anti-structure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%