2017
DOI: 10.1186/s12909-017-1064-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Burnout in medical students: a systematic review of experiences in Chinese medical schools

Abstract: BackgroundTo identify the: extent to which medical students in China experience burnout; factors contributing to this; potential solutions to reduce and prevent burnout in this group; and the extent to which the experiences of Chinese students reflect the international literature.MethodsSystematic review and narrative synthesis. Key words, synonyms and subject headings were used to search five electronic databases in addition to manual searching of relevant journals. Titles and abstracts of publications betwee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
103
4
23

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
9
103
4
23
Order By: Relevance
“…As compared with the average value in the general population (48), it was found that the score in the present medical student cohort was lower, but we were not able to make clear whether this comparison was statistically signi cant. For the life satisfaction scale, the total score of the participants ranged from 10 to 33 (the full score was 35), with an average score of 19 (SD=5.5) ( Table 2), which was very similar to the neutral point of the scale (20). For the subjective happiness scale, similar ndings were observed: the participants' sum score ranged from 13 to 24 (the full score was 28), with a mean of 18 (SD=2.8; Table 2), and was located in the average range of the general population score (18)(19)(20)(21)(22).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As compared with the average value in the general population (48), it was found that the score in the present medical student cohort was lower, but we were not able to make clear whether this comparison was statistically signi cant. For the life satisfaction scale, the total score of the participants ranged from 10 to 33 (the full score was 35), with an average score of 19 (SD=5.5) ( Table 2), which was very similar to the neutral point of the scale (20). For the subjective happiness scale, similar ndings were observed: the participants' sum score ranged from 13 to 24 (the full score was 28), with a mean of 18 (SD=2.8; Table 2), and was located in the average range of the general population score (18)(19)(20)(21)(22).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…For the life satisfaction scale, the total score of the participants ranged from 10 to 33 (the full score was 35), with an average score of 19 (SD=5.5) ( Table 2), which was very similar to the neutral point of the scale (20). For the subjective happiness scale, similar ndings were observed: the participants' sum score ranged from 13 to 24 (the full score was 28), with a mean of 18 (SD=2.8; Table 2), and was located in the average range of the general population score (18)(19)(20)(21)(22). These ndings indicate that the life satisfaction and subjective happiness scales of the participants were in the average range of the general population.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our study, 71.0 percent of students were included in the group characterized by moderate or high levels of burnout, that is by the results of the latest meta-analyses (60,79).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike patient experience, measurement of clinician experience of providing care generally occurs in relation to a specific change project, with particular focus given to clinician engagement, for example in promoting the use of evidence in clinical practice 15 . A further body of research has provided evidence of psychological experiences associated with clinical work such as burnout, depression, stress, fatigue and experiences of stressful events such as clinical error (7)(8)(9). These data provide important information about the impacts of clinical work but are not comparable to the information sought from patients(10) holistically about their experiences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%