2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2022.111726
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Burnable absorbers in nuclear reactors – A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the world continues to address the urgent need for decarbonization and transition to renewable energy sources, REEs have emerged as critical components in various technologies, such as electric vehicles, magnetic refrigeration, fluorescent lamps, nuclear reactors, and wind turbines (Evans et al., 2022; Pavel et al., 2017; Zhou et al., 2016). Although these alternatives offer substantial environmental benefits, their widespread adoption raises concerns about the potential pollution problems associated with the extraction, production, and disposal of REE products.…”
Section: Anthropogenic Impacts On Ree Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the world continues to address the urgent need for decarbonization and transition to renewable energy sources, REEs have emerged as critical components in various technologies, such as electric vehicles, magnetic refrigeration, fluorescent lamps, nuclear reactors, and wind turbines (Evans et al., 2022; Pavel et al., 2017; Zhou et al., 2016). Although these alternatives offer substantial environmental benefits, their widespread adoption raises concerns about the potential pollution problems associated with the extraction, production, and disposal of REE products.…”
Section: Anthropogenic Impacts On Ree Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• In case of use of so-called "burnable poisons" (Evans et al, 2022), gradual removal of absorber nuclides typically present in the "burnable poisons", such as 10 B, 113 Cd, 155,157 Gd, etc.…”
Section: Long-term Effects From Fuel Depletionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cost in the leftmost panel is the objective function result from Eq. (1). The red points denote designs that did not satisfy the constraint on the number of gadolinia pins.…”
Section: List Of Figuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, gadolinia absorbers have been used in PWR designs, especially those with increasing fuel enrichment. Gadolinia absorbers have extended effectiveness for reactivity suppression compared with Integral Fuel Burnable Absorber (IFBA) and operational convenience compared with wet annular burnable absorbers and Pyrex rods that are commonly used in PWR assemblies [1]. Gadolinia-loaded fuel rod locations in 17 × 17 PWR lattices with dominant fuel enrichment ranging from 4.4% to 4.95% and carrier fuel enrichment (fuel enrichment in the gadolinia rod) ranging from 2.6% to 4.7% were investigated for 6-11 wt % gadolinia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%