2000
DOI: 10.1179/007817200790177815
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Burial Practices in the Northern Danelaw, c.650–1100

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Halsall argued that burial rites can only be used confidently to identify migrants where the new burial rites have a direct link with those used in the homeland, the comparable rites in the homeland are chronologically earlier, and the newly introduced rites differ significantly from those of the indigenous population (Halsall , 262). In later Anglo‐Saxon England, burial rites are diverse and grave‐good deposition continued, albeit occasionally, even in Christian contexts (Hadley ). Thus, the deposition of grave goods per se does not necessarily indicate that the individual buried with them was either pagan or of Scandinavian descent (Halsall , 262–8).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Halsall argued that burial rites can only be used confidently to identify migrants where the new burial rites have a direct link with those used in the homeland, the comparable rites in the homeland are chronologically earlier, and the newly introduced rites differ significantly from those of the indigenous population (Halsall , 262). In later Anglo‐Saxon England, burial rites are diverse and grave‐good deposition continued, albeit occasionally, even in Christian contexts (Hadley ). Thus, the deposition of grave goods per se does not necessarily indicate that the individual buried with them was either pagan or of Scandinavian descent (Halsall , 262–8).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It seems very likely that the changes in the furnished burial ritual in the seventh century, and the fairly swift decline of burial with grave goods, together with the establishment of churchyard burial, was associated in some way with the introduction of Christianity to Anglo-Saxon England. However, the early church in Anglo-Saxon England cannot be shown to have taken any steps to suppress or condemn burial with grave goods, and the exact mechanism by which the deposition of grave goods with burials was replaced by unaccompanied church burial, and the motivation for this change, remains a subject for debate (Hadley 2000b;Meaney 2003;Blair forthcoming).…”
Section: The Anglo-saxon Furnished Burial Ritualmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research specific to later Anglo‐Saxon cemeteries has provided convincing evidence that the provision of stone‐built cists or rubble‐lined graves correlates with high social status (Buckberry, ; Craig & Buckberry, ; Hadley, ). Preferential areas for burial have been identified at a number of later Anglo‐Saxon sites, such as Jarrow (Northumberland) (Lowther, ) and Barton‐upon‐Humber (North Lincolnshire; Rodwell, ), where increased densities of burials next to church buildings reflect desire for burial in locis sanctis (holy ground) or ad sanctos (next to the saints; Hadley, ; Zadora‐Rio, ). Elaborate interments next to churches and minsters further evidence the prestige of burial next to ecclesiastical buildings (Boddington, ; Cramp & Lowther, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%