2023
DOI: 10.1007/s40121-023-00814-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Burden of Disease of Gonorrhoea in Latin America: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Abstract: Introduction Neisseria gonorrhoeae causes gonorrhoea, a globally neglected but increasing disease. This systematic review and meta-analysis reviewed the epidemiology and economic burden of gonorrhoea in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC). Methods We searched PubMed, EMBase, Cochrane Library, EconLIT, CINAHL, CRD, LILACS, Global Health, Global Dissertations and Theses, SciELO, Web of Science databases, countries’ ministries of health, and the IHME’s Glo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 120 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, a study in Latin America reported a pooled N. gonorrhea prevalence of 2.9% in young people ( Vallejo-Ortega et al, 2023 ). While another study found gonorrhea prevalence at 1.46% in Latin America and the Caribbean, rising to 5.68% in high-risk populations ( Bardach et al, 2023 ). In contrast, studies in China, sub-Saharan Africa, and South Africa reported N. gonorrhea prevalence rates of 6, 5.46, and 10.1%, respectively ( Su et al, 2015 ; Kularatne et al, 2018 ; Kassa et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, a study in Latin America reported a pooled N. gonorrhea prevalence of 2.9% in young people ( Vallejo-Ortega et al, 2023 ). While another study found gonorrhea prevalence at 1.46% in Latin America and the Caribbean, rising to 5.68% in high-risk populations ( Bardach et al, 2023 ). In contrast, studies in China, sub-Saharan Africa, and South Africa reported N. gonorrhea prevalence rates of 6, 5.46, and 10.1%, respectively ( Su et al, 2015 ; Kularatne et al, 2018 ; Kassa et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%