2022
DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2203318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Buprenorphine versus Methadone for Opioid Use Disorder in Pregnancy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is uncertain if pyloric stenosis is congenital or acquired, and suggested risk factors include preterm birth, cesarean delivery, male sex, maternal smoking, bottle feeding, and macrolide antibiotic exposure in the neonatal period. [22][23][24][25] These risk factors are not likely explanations for the association we observed; the risk of preterm birth is increased with methadone exposure, 3 and between-group differences in other risk factors are not expected. While the majority of pyloric stenosis cases were in male infants, the increase in risk with buprenorphine compared with methadone was sustained in both male and female infants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is uncertain if pyloric stenosis is congenital or acquired, and suggested risk factors include preterm birth, cesarean delivery, male sex, maternal smoking, bottle feeding, and macrolide antibiotic exposure in the neonatal period. [22][23][24][25] These risk factors are not likely explanations for the association we observed; the risk of preterm birth is increased with methadone exposure, 3 and between-group differences in other risk factors are not expected. While the majority of pyloric stenosis cases were in male infants, the increase in risk with buprenorphine compared with methadone was sustained in both male and female infants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…We also explored the possibility that there may be increased monitoring in the neonatal period in patients treated with methadone due to increased risk of neonatal abstinence syndrome compared with buprenorphine. [3][4][5]19 However, the median days from delivery to diagnosis did not differ meaningfully between buprenorphine-and methadone-exposed infants, suggesting that detection bias does not explain these results. Such detection bias also would not apply to malformations immediately apparent at birth, including oral clefts, clubfoot, and limb malformations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This percent linkage is lower than percentages reported in other infant‐linked data, though methods used to calculate linkage percentages vary with respect to numerator and denominator inclusion as well as percentage calculation before versus after application of study‐specific inclusion and exclusion criteria (Table 5). 5,12–14 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A meta-analysis assessing 16 cohort studies and four randomized control trials demonstrated higher birth weight and body length, reduced prematurity, and lower risk of adverse events for birthing people in buprenorphine-exposed pregnancies relative to methadone, but also demonstrated higher dropout with buprenorphine [46]. A subsequent large cohort study of public insurance data demonstrated lower rates of NOWS, preterm birth, small for gestational age, and low birthweight in neonates exposed to buprenorphine, with no difference in cesarean deliveries or morbidity for the birthing person [47].…”
Section: First-line Agent Selectionmentioning
confidence: 95%