2015
DOI: 10.4103/0975-7406.155921
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bupivacaine versus lignocaine as the choice of locall anesthetic agent for impacted third molar surgery a review

Abstract: One of the most important goal in minor surgical procedures is to achieve proper and sufficient anesthesia and analgesia preoperatively, intraoperatively and in the immediate postoperative period. Several local anesthetic agents have been cited in the literature and studied. Bupivacaine is one of the most common long-acting anesthetic agents being used for surgical removal of impacted third molars. Lignocaine is one of the commonest short-acting anesthetic agents being used for the same procedure. In this revi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(6 reference statements)
2
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[6] Equal amount of local anaesthetic was used in patients undergoing surgical removal of the lower third molars to prevent dose-response relation bias. Bupivacaine is four times potent than lignocaine in equal concentrations (the smaller 0.5% concentration of bupivacaine becomes equipotent to 2% lignocaine) [7] and their toxicities at these concentrations will be equal, so these concentrations were used for comparison in this study. [8] The difference in onset of anaesthesia in lignocaine was much lesser than bupivacaine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[6] Equal amount of local anaesthetic was used in patients undergoing surgical removal of the lower third molars to prevent dose-response relation bias. Bupivacaine is four times potent than lignocaine in equal concentrations (the smaller 0.5% concentration of bupivacaine becomes equipotent to 2% lignocaine) [7] and their toxicities at these concentrations will be equal, so these concentrations were used for comparison in this study. [8] The difference in onset of anaesthesia in lignocaine was much lesser than bupivacaine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4] A combination of 0.5% bupivacaine with adrenaline 1:200,000 when used gives similar results. [7] www.wjpr.net Vol 6, Issue 4, 2017. 703…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The onset of bupivacaine ranges from 1-17 min and the duration of action lasts 2-9 h. The duration of anaesthesia is significantly longer with Bupivacaine than with any other commonly used local anesthetic. It is usually used at a 0.5% concentration [6].…”
Section: Objectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its disadvantages are slow onset of action and decreased motor block. 4 Hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% is extensively used local anaesthetic via intrathecal route. Though the duration of action of bupivacaine is prolonged, it will not produce prolonged post operative analgesia.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%