Bundle of Rights Reversed: Anticommons in a Japanese Common Property Forest Due to Legalization

Abstract

Commons studies have emphasized the importance of customary rights and informal institutions, arguing that if there is a gap between formal ownership titles and customary rights, then the latter must be respected. However, as customary practices weaken, the influence of state legal systems and registered titles becomes stronger. When the commons is registered under multiple co-owners' names, the commoners come to believe that they hold a normal common property and keep these rights even after they leave the village. This phenomenon, called legalization, leads to the tragedy of the anticommons because the number of rights holders outside the village increases. This paper explains the underuse of Japanese common property forests due to this legalization, especially in terms of two points derived from microdata analysis of the 2000 census. First, in the case of multiple co-owners, the number of ex-villagers who keep their rights is very high. Second, when ex-villagers keep their rights and the registered name includes multiple coowners, forestry activities are most infrequent. This paper names this situation "Bundle of Rights Reversed," in which those outside the community have strong rights to prevent change in forest use, and propose the application of a different legal rule. This framework would be useful for a comparative study on the formalization of commons tenure rights.

Tragedy of the Anticommons (ToA) in Agricultural Land Partition involving Fragmented Co-proprietorships: An Analysis of Malaysian Case Laws

“…Application of ToA in urban and land resources (e.g., land dealing and development) is not entirely new (Lueck and Miceli, 2007). For example, see Lin and Huang, 2013 on ToA in the urban redevelopment in Taiwan, see Takamura et al, 2021 andTakahashi et al, 2021…”

Conditions for Collective Land Use by Community-Based Organizations: Case Study of Community Farming Enterprises in Japan

“…Recent studies, such as those of Miyanaga and Shimada (2018) and Hirahara (2020), examine the underuse of semi-natural grassland as common pool resources and discuss the consequences and causes of underuse. Takamura et al (2021) and Takahashi et al (2021) investigate the underuse problem of common property forests in Japan as an anticommons problem. The current analysis discusses the underuse of farmlands, which are private properties that provide economic benefit and agri-environmental public goods when used collectively, and demonstrates how community-based organizations can overcome the tragedy of the anticommons.…”

(Re)building historical commons : Exploring forest commoning as a transformative practice in the Northwestern Iberian Peninsula

“…This paper looks into situations in which commoners have rights but do not engage with forest commons, resulting in situations of abandonment or underuse (Lopes et al 2013, Takamura et al 2021). These situations occur when local livelihoods are no longer linked to the regulated forest commons (because subsistence traditional economies have been abandoned, or/and reforestation has shaped potential uses), and new uses that sustain the community have not been developed yet because of depopulation or other drivers.…”