2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2003.12364
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bump Functions With Monotone Fourier Transforms Satisfying Decay Bounds

Tamer Tlas

Abstract: The existence of a smooth, compactly supported function with monotone (on the half-line) Fourier transform satisfying two-sided decay bounds is demonstrated.

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More interestingly, there are also absolutely continuous distributions with this property. In [13], a function f ∈ C ∞ (R) which is real, nonnegative, symmetric, supported on [−1, 1], not identically equal to zero and such that its (real-valued) Fourier transform f (t) is monotone decreasing for t ≥ 0 (and hence nonnegative) is constructed. After possibly rescaling, any such f is the probability density function of some absolutely continuous random variable, which by Theorem 1.8 is reasonable with respect to cos(x).…”
Section: Model and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More interestingly, there are also absolutely continuous distributions with this property. In [13], a function f ∈ C ∞ (R) which is real, nonnegative, symmetric, supported on [−1, 1], not identically equal to zero and such that its (real-valued) Fourier transform f (t) is monotone decreasing for t ≥ 0 (and hence nonnegative) is constructed. After possibly rescaling, any such f is the probability density function of some absolutely continuous random variable, which by Theorem 1.8 is reasonable with respect to cos(x).…”
Section: Model and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assume that Ef (a + dX) is well defined and finite for all a ∈ R n , d > 0. Letting, as we do for payoff functions, Ef (a + dX), (13) assume that there exist d 1 < d 2 so that g X,f (d 1 ) < g X,f (d 2 ). Then there exists a payoff function f ′ (hence bounded from above by definition) so that (X, f ′ ) is not reasonable.…”
Section: From Nonreasonable Bounded Payoff Functions To Nonnegative C...mentioning
confidence: 99%