2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsp.2019.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bullying immigrant versus non-immigrant peers: Moral disengagement and participant roles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
38
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
38
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These factors include having few close friends, dissatisfaction with family relationships, and loneliness, all of which are also known factors associated with adapting to a new country [11,19]. Studies further show that immigrant youth were more likely than non-immigrants to be bullied on religious or racial grounds [20,21], an observation that points to the potential role of antiimmigrant sentiment in host countries as an additional mechanism underlying bullying risk in this population; and one that may also extend to experiences of cyber-bullying [18,22]. Further, while prior research supports the role of immigrant networks and transnational networks in buffering the socially disruptive event of migration [14,15], there has been no empirical studies examining whether network contacts in the receiving country and/or country of origin may also be sources of cyberbullying.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These factors include having few close friends, dissatisfaction with family relationships, and loneliness, all of which are also known factors associated with adapting to a new country [11,19]. Studies further show that immigrant youth were more likely than non-immigrants to be bullied on religious or racial grounds [20,21], an observation that points to the potential role of antiimmigrant sentiment in host countries as an additional mechanism underlying bullying risk in this population; and one that may also extend to experiences of cyber-bullying [18,22]. Further, while prior research supports the role of immigrant networks and transnational networks in buffering the socially disruptive event of migration [14,15], there has been no empirical studies examining whether network contacts in the receiving country and/or country of origin may also be sources of cyberbullying.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These factors include having few close friends, dissatisfaction with family relationships, and loneliness, all of which are also factors known to be associated with adapting to a new country (11,17). Studies further indicate that immigrant youth are more likely than nonimmigrants to be bullied on religious or racial grounds (18,19), an observation that points to the potential role of anti-immigrant sentiment in host countries as an additional mechanism underlying bullying risk in this population; and one that may also extend to experiences of cyber-bullying (16,20).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These factors include having few close friends, dissatisfaction with family relationships, and loneliness, all of which are also factors known to be associated with adapting to a new country (11,19). Studies further indicate that immigrant youth are more likely than nonimmigrants to be bullied on religious or racial grounds (20,21), an observation that points to the potential role of anti-immigrant sentiment in host countries as an additional mechanism underlying bullying risk in this population; and one that may also extend to experiences of cyber-bullying (18,22). Further, while previous research supports the prominent role of immigrant networks and transnational networks in buffering the socially disruptive event of migration (14,15), there has been no empirical studies examining whether network contacts in the receiving country and/or country of origin are also potential sources of cyberbullying.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%