2011
DOI: 10.5296/ijhrs.v1i1.907
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bullying at work: A comprehensive definition and consequences based on an empirical study

Abstract: This paper determines a comprehensive definition of workplace bullying and explores its job-related consequences. In the present study multi-methods approach was used which consist of questionnaire and in depth interviews. Interview was used in order to investigate perception and experience of workplace bullying and questionnaire to explore the consequences of workplace bullying. Results show bullying involves negative behaviors e.g. harassing, socially excluding someone and/or negatively effecting someone's w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Work performance is a fundamental element of any organization (Khan et al, 2012) and entails successfully accomplishing an assigned task, subject to the normal constraints of reasonable utilization of the resources available (Dar, Akmal, Naseem, & Khan, 2011).In this context, the consequences of workplace bullying (low motivation, absenteeism, high turnover, and low job satisfaction) are liable to affect work performance (Anjum et al, 2011). Georgakopoulos et al (2011) use qualitative data collected from a series of focus groups (comprising 112 undergraduate students, 72 Master's students, and 40 doctoral students) to conduct interpretive structural modeling.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Work performance is a fundamental element of any organization (Khan et al, 2012) and entails successfully accomplishing an assigned task, subject to the normal constraints of reasonable utilization of the resources available (Dar, Akmal, Naseem, & Khan, 2011).In this context, the consequences of workplace bullying (low motivation, absenteeism, high turnover, and low job satisfaction) are liable to affect work performance (Anjum et al, 2011). Georgakopoulos et al (2011) use qualitative data collected from a series of focus groups (comprising 112 undergraduate students, 72 Master's students, and 40 doctoral students) to conduct interpretive structural modeling.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, many organizations recognize the need to change the culture of the workplace and have developed clear policies to protect their employees from bullying (Bashir & Hanif, 2011). A number of studies have also looked at the prevalence of this problem in Pakistan (see Anjum, Yasmeen, &Yasmeen, 2011;Bano & Malik, 2013;Bashir & Hanif, 2011;Imran, Jawaid, Haider, & Masood, 2010;Tahir & Konstantinos, 2011). While the Protection against Harassment of Women at the Workplace Act 2010 was designed to counter instances of bullying against women, the success of its implementation remains uncertain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variation and difficulties in the definitions ofdisruptive behaviors phenomenon may hinder the conceptualization in a more consistent way. 2 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variation in definitions may hinder the conceptualization of the workplace-bullying phenomenon in a more consistent way, inhibiting effective contributions among researchers and practitioners [7]. Bullying is commonly defined by its social manifestations, which are clearly classifiable under the same umbrella as aggressive behavior [8] that generally occurs during interpersonal interactions in work settings [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%