2003
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.67.125010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bulk quantum effects for de Sitter branes inAdS5

Abstract: We investigate some issues regarding quantum corrections for de Sitter branes in a bulk AdS5 spacetime. The one-loop effective action for a Majorana spinor field is evaluated and compared with the scalar field result. We also evaluate the cocycle function for various boundary conditions, finding that the quantum corrections naturally induce higher order curvature terms in the original action and, in general, it is not possible to eliminate the cocycle function by renormalisation. In the one brane limit care mu… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results have been extended to the case of conformally coupled Majorana spinors in Ref. [24], still by making use of conformal transformations. The cases of a massless conformally coupled scalar field and of a massive minimally coupled field for de Sitter branes embedded in both de Sitter and AdS bulks have been considered in Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…These results have been extended to the case of conformally coupled Majorana spinors in Ref. [24], still by making use of conformal transformations. The cases of a massless conformally coupled scalar field and of a massive minimally coupled field for de Sitter branes embedded in both de Sitter and AdS bulks have been considered in Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Here we focus on the specific case of a massless conformally coupled field, as this allows us to compare our result to that of Refs. [22,24]. By setting σ = 1/2 in Eqs.…”
Section: Limiting Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations