2021
DOI: 10.1007/s41981-021-00208-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bulk Nanobubbles: generation using a two-chamber swirling flow nozzle and long-term stability in water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Changing the coinjection ratio and total injection flow rate did not affect the CO 2 content. This finding is somewhat contradictory to the results in the literature, 55 but we note the fundamental difference between high-pressure samples in a closed system (this research) and low-pressure samples in an open system in the literature. The results suggest that the gas content of CO 2 nanobubble dispersions at high pressure is less sensitive to the injection parameters than that of low-pressure nanobubble dispersions in an open system.…”
Section: Gas Content Measurementcontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Changing the coinjection ratio and total injection flow rate did not affect the CO 2 content. This finding is somewhat contradictory to the results in the literature, 55 but we note the fundamental difference between high-pressure samples in a closed system (this research) and low-pressure samples in an open system in the literature. The results suggest that the gas content of CO 2 nanobubble dispersions at high pressure is less sensitive to the injection parameters than that of low-pressure nanobubble dispersions in an open system.…”
Section: Gas Content Measurementcontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…PKC was purchased as powder from Tokopedia (https://www.tokopedia.com/). Nanobubbled water was generated by dissolving ambient air into aquadest according to the method which had been described by Alam and colleagues (2022) [7], until their density was ≥ 100 per mL. At that time, the average size of the bubbles was less than 100 nm, while their average zeta potential was around -20 mV.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nanobubbles have been reported to be negatively charged at pH values from 4 to 12 and zeta potential values from −4.3 to −62 mV, respectively. At neutral pH, the measured zetapotential values were between −20 and −30 mV [34][35][36].…”
Section: Zeta Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%