2017
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx3165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bulgeless galaxies in the COSMOS field: environment and star formation evolution at z < 1

Abstract: Combining the catalogue of galaxy morphologies in the COSMOS field and the sample of Hα emitters at redshifts z = 0.4 and z = 0.84 of the HiZELS survey, we selected ∼ 220 star-forming bulgeless systems (Sérsic index n ≤ 1.5) at both epochs. We present their star formation properties and we investigate their contribution to the star formation rate function (SFRF) and global star formation rate density (SFRD) at z < 1. For comparison, we also analyse Hα emitters with more structurally evolved morphologies that w… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
12
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
4
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Results tend to agree that higher density environments increase the fraction of quiescent (red) galaxies and we do see this in the COSMOS field (see top right panel of Figure 28; Peng et al 2010;McGee et al 2011;Scoville et al 2013;Darvish et al 2014Darvish et al , 2016. Whether or not the normalization of the MS (defined for starforming galaxies) depends on galaxy environment is still under debate, but many studies identify no variations of MS with environments such as clusters and voids, e.g., Tyler et al (2013), Koyama et al (2014), Ricciardelli et al (2014), Tyler et al (2014), Grossi et al (2018), Paulino-Afonso et al (2019), Pharo et al (2020 (although see Duivenvoorden et al 2016 who found a difference at 1.5 < z < 2 in COSMOS). However, at low redshift (z < 0.3), studies have reported a clear dependence of the MS on galaxy environment (e.g., von der Linden et al 2010, Haines et al 2013, Gu et al 2018, Paccagnella et al 2016).…”
Section: Environmental Trendssupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results tend to agree that higher density environments increase the fraction of quiescent (red) galaxies and we do see this in the COSMOS field (see top right panel of Figure 28; Peng et al 2010;McGee et al 2011;Scoville et al 2013;Darvish et al 2014Darvish et al , 2016. Whether or not the normalization of the MS (defined for starforming galaxies) depends on galaxy environment is still under debate, but many studies identify no variations of MS with environments such as clusters and voids, e.g., Tyler et al (2013), Koyama et al (2014), Ricciardelli et al (2014), Tyler et al (2014), Grossi et al (2018), Paulino-Afonso et al (2019), Pharo et al (2020 (although see Duivenvoorden et al 2016 who found a difference at 1.5 < z < 2 in COSMOS). However, at low redshift (z < 0.3), studies have reported a clear dependence of the MS on galaxy environment (e.g., von der Linden et al 2010, Haines et al 2013, Gu et al 2018, Paccagnella et al 2016).…”
Section: Environmental Trendssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The fraction of star formation in irregular galaxies is roughly constant at around 20% in the three redshift bins shown but is slightly decreased in favor of galaxies classified as spheroidal for masses 10 11 M . Grossi et al (2018) found that, integrated over all luminosities, pure disk galaxies contribute significantly more to the cosmic SFRD at z < 1 and that the decline in sSFR with redshift is faster for bulge-dominated systems than for pure disks.…”
Section: Morphology Trendsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Lackner & Gunn 2013). At intermediate redshifts (z ∼ 0.4−0.8), Grossi et al (2018) find that a sample of Hα-selected galaxies tend to have more prominent bulges in higher-density environments. However, we lack observations of the environmental dependence of the bulge prevalence at these redshifts for a continuum-selected sample.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…These relations have been extensively studied in the local universe (Blanton & Moustakas 2009), and have been explored at high redshifts using several deep field survey data ⋆ E-mail: hhwang@kasi.re.kr † E-mail: jhshin@kasi.re.kr ‡ E-mail: hmsong@kasi.re.kr (e.g. Cucciati et al 2006;Cooper et al 2007;Grossi et al 2018;Pelliccia et al 2019). Understanding this environmental dependence of galaxy properties and its evolution with redshift is very important in modern astrophysics because it provides strong constraints on the model of galaxy formation and evolution (Peng et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%