Bulbine ASPHODELACEAE

Jaarsveld, E. Van; Forster, P. I.

doi:10.1007/978-3-662-56486-8_53

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The Bulbine genus represents an opportunity to investigate daily flower‐pollinator synchrony. The genus has highest diversity in Southern Africa, with many species growing in winter rainfall areas and have limited number of inflorescences (Hammer, 2005; Van Jaarsveld & Forster, 2020; Williamson, 2016). Most species are self‐incompatible (Duffy & Johnson, 2015), in the few compatible species outcrossing improves seed production (Malele et al, 2016; Owen et al, 2007; Vaughton et al, 2008).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Flowers are produced in ascending order on each inflorescence, with a number of flowers opening per day, but each flower opens for just one day (Naidoo et al, 2011; Owen et al, 2007). Bulbine flowers do not produce nectar, but attract pollinators by offering pollen and anther hairs that mimic pollen (Duffy & Johnson, 2015; Naidoo et al, 2011; Van Jaarsveld & Forster, 2020). Due to the small number of flowers per plant on a given day, self‐incompatibility, limited attractants and a single day of opening, Bulbine represents an extreme case where flower opening must be synchronous with pollinator abundance to successfully cross‐pollinate.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Flowers of a South African succulent plant predict tomorrow's weather, synchronizing flower opening with pollinator activity

Gilbert

2023

Functional Ecology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Day‐to‐day synchrony between flower opening and pollinator activity is important for maximizing plant fitness. A succulent, Bulbine frutescens (L.) Willd., is an ideal model for studying synchrony in response to daily weather as it flowers year‐round. Additionally, it has self‐incompatible flowers that open for just one day, making it essential that flower opening matches pollinator activity. Observations were made on urban plants in California, USA, with validation measurements in the native range in South Africa. Independent observations indicated that flowers open primarily after favourable conditions the previous day, specifically air temperatures above 15°C. Solar radiation was experimentally shown to have limited, but significant effects. Pollinators, mostly bee species, had similar temperature thresholds to flowers. Developmental constraints on flowers were hypothesized to delay opening by a day. Flower bud growth was closely related to temperature, with warm days resulting in sufficient growth for buds to become competent to open the following day. Laboratory experiments demonstrated that competent flowers were suppressed from opening until at least 16 h was accumulated in which temperatures were above 12°C; thus, on many cool days, sufficient development to cause flower opening would only occur a day after favourable weather. Based upon regression models of pollinator and flower response to weather, fitness was estimated as a function of synchrony, over 20 years of weather from California and across the natural range in South Africa. Flowers responding to either the previous day's or current day's weather resulted in similar predicted fitness, with flower response to the current day's weather leading to a slightly higher cost, that is, flowers opened when pollinators would be absent. Multiple temperature responsive constraints on bud growth and development result in delays in flower opening, such that flower opening occurs the day after favourable weather. Given the high correlation between daily temperatures in USA and South African winter‐rainfall environments, behaviour predicting the following day's weather results in high fitness. Many pollinators share similar temperature thresholds for activity, thus diverse plants may have evolved predictive behaviour maximizing daily synchrony between pollinators and flower opening. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

show abstract