Built environmental correlates of older adults’ total physical activity and walking: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

BackgroundIdentifying attributes of the built environment associated with health-enhancing levels of physical activity (PA) in older adults (≥65 years old) has the potential to inform interventions supporting healthy and active ageing. The aim of this study was to first systematically review and quantify findings on built environmental correlates of older adults’ PA, and second, investigate differences by type of PA and environmental attribute measurement.MethodsOne hundred articles from peer-reviewed and grey literature examining built environmental attributes related to total PA met inclusion criteria and relevant information was extracted. Findings were meta-analysed and weighted by article quality and sample size and then stratified by PA and environmental measurement method. Associations (p < .05) were found in relation to 26 individual built environmental attributes across six categories (walkability, residential density/urbanisation, street connectivity, access to/availability of destinations and services, infrastructure and streetscape, and safety) and total PA and walking specifically. Reported individual- and environmental-level moderators were also examined.ResultsPositive environmental correlates of PA, ranked by strength of evidence, were: walkability (p < .001), safety from crime (p < .001), overall access to destinations and services (p < .001), recreational facilities (p < .001), parks/public open space (p = .002) and shops/commercial destinations (p = .006), greenery and aesthetically pleasing scenery (p = .004), walk-friendly infrastructure (p = .009), and access to public transport (p = .016). There were 26 individual differences in the number of significant associations when the type of PA and environmental measurement method was considered. No consistent moderating effects on the association between built environmental attributes and PA were found.ConclusionsSafe, walkable, and aesthetically pleasing neighbourhoods, with access to overall and specific destinations and services positively influenced older adults’ PA participation. However, when considering the environmental attributes that were sufficiently studied (i.e., in ≥5 separate findings), the strength of evidence of associations of specific categories of environment attributes with PA differed across PA and environmental measurement types. Future research should be mindful of these differences in findings and identify the underlying mechanisms. Higher quality research is also needed.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12966-017-0558-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Built environment and cardio‐metabolic health: systematic review and meta‐analysis of longitudinal studies

“…Barnett et al . extended this tool by adding an item to assess the study design. The assessment items in the original tool included [1] sample representativeness; [2] study design; [3] exposure variability (study areas selected to maximize the variability in the exposure variables); [4] adjustment for individual socio‐demographic covariates; [5] adjustment for residential self‐selection; [6] accounting for area‐level clustering; and [7] appropriate presentation of analysis results.…”

Exploring the Associations of Walking Behavior with Neighborhood Environments by Different Life Stages: A Cross-Sectional Study in a Smaller Chinese City

“…After completing the survey, each participant was given a non-monetary incentive as a token of appreciation for their contribution to the research. As this study is an initial exploration of smaller Chinese cities and the sample size of most studies investigating the associations between the built environment and physical activity was 101-300 [56], we collected 200 questionnaires. All data was carefully checked in three steps of screening, diagnosis, and editing [57] and 27 questionnaires were excluded.…”

International Mind, Activities and Urban Places (iMAP) study: methods of a cohort study on environmental and lifestyle influences on brain and cognitive health

“…A substantial number of studies have reported significant effects of aspects of the urban environment (residential neighbourhoods, in particular) on physical activity, cardiovascular health and obesity, [14][15][16][17][18] which are established determinants of cognitive health. 8 However, the role of urban environments in relation to brain and cognitive health has received little attention.…”