2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2011.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Built environment instruments for walkability, bikeability, and recreation: Disability and universal design relevant?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Singhal & Siddhu, 2014), socially or economically disadvantaged population subgroups (e.g. low income or minority groups) (Miles, Panton, Jang, & Haymes, 2008;Turrell, Haynes, Wilson, & Giles-Corti, 2013) or even people with impairments (Gray, Zimmerman, & Rimmer, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Singhal & Siddhu, 2014), socially or economically disadvantaged population subgroups (e.g. low income or minority groups) (Miles, Panton, Jang, & Haymes, 2008;Turrell, Haynes, Wilson, & Giles-Corti, 2013) or even people with impairments (Gray, Zimmerman, & Rimmer, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The participants consisted of 30 physically disabled people, 30 who were visually impaired, 30 with hearing impairment, and 30 trainers. They identified problems, barriers, and needs to obtain solutions [6], as indicated in Table 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research aims to collect data for design and development to increase work effectiveness for people with physical disabilities [6] in department stores, retailers, and wholesalers in Bangkok. The researchers used the following conceptual framework:…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, an instrument that would allow this kind of evaluation in the Brazilian urban context has not yet been found in literature 30 . The combination of literature synthesis, conceptual framework and expert opinion has allowed content validity to be established by different sources.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%