2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2020.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building ubiquitination machineries: E3 ligase multi-subunit assembly and substrate targeting by PROTACs and molecular glues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Beyond the ligases already vetted for TPD development, there are several other ubiquitin ligases, enabled by structural and/or validated substrate information, that present a path for the development of small molecules that can ultimately be converted into PROTACs, yet await development as potential PROTACable ligases. Most of these ‘low-hanging fruit’ ligases with structural data have been summarized by two excellent reviews 139 , 140 . However, it must also be mentioned that the definition of low-hanging fruit with respect to structural enablement of ligases has recently been redefined with the ground-breaking publication of artificial intelligence (AI)-driven tertiary structure prediction models from Google/DeepMind 141 and RoseTTAFold 142 .…”
Section: Outlook For the Next 20 Years Of Tpdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond the ligases already vetted for TPD development, there are several other ubiquitin ligases, enabled by structural and/or validated substrate information, that present a path for the development of small molecules that can ultimately be converted into PROTACs, yet await development as potential PROTACable ligases. Most of these ‘low-hanging fruit’ ligases with structural data have been summarized by two excellent reviews 139 , 140 . However, it must also be mentioned that the definition of low-hanging fruit with respect to structural enablement of ligases has recently been redefined with the ground-breaking publication of artificial intelligence (AI)-driven tertiary structure prediction models from Google/DeepMind 141 and RoseTTAFold 142 .…”
Section: Outlook For the Next 20 Years Of Tpdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Isothermal calorimetry (ITC), fluorescence polarization (FP), size exclusion chromatography (SEC), and luminescent proximity assay (i.e., aLISA) are among popular techniques that allow the measurement of these thermodynamic parameters under steady state conditions. 20 In addition to the recent understanding emerging from crystal structures, 21 these biophysical methods have helped define interactions at the protein–protein interface that can display both cooperative behavior and recently appreciated plasticity. Notably, bivalent degrader design can capitalize on protein–protein interactions (i.e., BRD4-VHL, 22 BRD4-CRBN, 23 BTK-CRBN 24 ) to develop more efficient degraders that can also benefit from cooperative behavior ( Figure 2 b).…”
Section: Induced Cooperativity and Pursuit Of Privileged Ternary Complexes For Proteasomal Degradationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By solving the crystal structure of MZ1, a Brd4 degrader, with von Hippel-Lindau protein (VHL) and Brd4 bromodomain 2 (Brd4 BD2 ), Gadd et al revealed that the formation of a stable and cooperative E3 ligase-PROTAC-POI ternary complex is important for PROTACs to effectively and specifically degrade their target 5 . This led to the development of a Brd4 PROTAC (AT1) with improved potency and selectivity, demonstrating the power of using structure-guided design to facilitate the development of PROTACs 5,6 . However, the induction of a stable ternary complex by a PROTAC does not always lead to the degradation of its target.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%