Building the Business Case for Women Corporate Directors

Bilimoria, Diana

doi:10.1007/978-90-481-3401-4_3

Cited by 175 publications

(149 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

129

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Female directors do not belong to old-boy networks and are more likely to provide constructive criticism and independent thinking (Adams & Ferreira, 2009). Gender-diverse boards are also more civilized in culture (Bilimoria, 2000;Fondas & Sassalos, 2000).…”

Section: Women On the Boardmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Composition and Compensation of the Board of Directors as Predictors of Corporate Fraud

Kim

Roden

Cox

2013

AFR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We test whether the composition and compensation of the board of directors are related to fraudulent corporate behavior. We use Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Releases from 2003 through 2010 to form a sample of 128 firms with violations and compare the characteristics of their boards to a matched sample of 128 control firms. SEC violations are less likely when the board has more women, independent members, and financial experts. Fraud is also less likely when director tenure is shorter and when the CEO is not the chair. Stock and especially stock option compensation are positively associated with SEC violations.

show abstract

Section: Women On the Boardmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Composition and Compensation of the Board of Directors as Predictors of Corporate Fraud

Kim

Roden

Cox

2013

AFR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The main diversity argument for women on corporate boards is that they exert a positive impact on tasks of qualitative nature such as strategic and CSR controls (Bilimoria, 2000;Rosener, 1990Rosener, , 1995Selby, 2000). One criticisms of men is that they focus on money and quantifiable issues and less on the human and social aspects of business (Huse and Solberg, 2006).…”

Section: Potential Contribution Of Women On Corporate Boardsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Women and Employee-Elected Board Members, and Their Contributions to Board Control Tasks

2009

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We present results from a study about women and employee-elected board members, and fill some of the gaps in the literature about their contribution to board effectiveness. The empirical data is from a unique data set of Norwegian firms. Board effectiveness is evaluated in relation to board control tasks including board CSR involvement. We found that the contributions of women and employee-elected board members varied depending on the board tasks studied. In the article we also explored the effects of the esteem of the women and employee-elected board members, and we used creative discussions in the boardroom as a mediating variable. Previous board research, including research about women and employeeelected directors, questions if the board members contribute to board effectiveness. The main message from this study is that it may be more important to ask how, rather than if, women and employee-elected board members contribute, and we need to open the black box of actual board behavior to explore how they may contribute.

show abstract

“…ÇalıĢmanın devam eden bölümlerinde ayrıntıları ile açıklanacak olan kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk ve yönetim kurulu çeĢitliliği arasındaki iliĢkiyi ele alan literatür incelendiğinde (Örn. Terjesen vd., 2009;Huse vd., 2009;Harjoto vd., 2014;Coffey ve Wang, 1998) bu iliĢkiyi konu edinen araĢtırmalarda yönetim kurulu alt baĢlıkları olarak; yaĢ (Harjoto vd., 2014;Hayes, 2001;Diamantopoulos, vd., 2003;Hafsi ve Turgut, 2013), cinsiyet (Bear vd., 2010;Huse vd., 2009;Bilimoria, 2000;Selby, 2000;Wang ve Coffey, 1992;Williams, 2003;Bernardi vd., 2006;Johnson ve Greening, 1999;FriasAceituno vd., 2013;Fondas, 1997;Burges ve Tharenou, 2002), eğitim (Cheah vd., 2011;Post vd., 2011) değiĢkenlerinin yer aldığı görülmektedir. Bu çalıĢmaların yanı sıra, araĢtırmanın diğer değiĢkenleri olan kurumsal çevre ve KSS arasındaki iliĢkiyi (Marquis vd., 2007;Campbell, 2007;Moon ve Vogel, 2008) ve yönetim kurulu çeĢitliliği, kurumsal çevre ve kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk arasındaki iliĢkiyi (Ntim ve Soobaroyen, 2013;Marquis vd., 2007;Muthuri ve Gilbert, 2011;Grosvold vd., 2007) kapsayan çalıĢmalardan hareketle geliĢtirilen araĢtırma modeli ġekil 1'de sunulmaktadır.…”

Section: çAlışmanın Kavramsal çErçevesi Ve Araştırma Modeliunclassified

Yönetim kurulu çeşitliliği ve kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk söylemleri arasındaki ilişki: Kurumsal çevrenin moderatör etkisi

KOPARAN¹

2016

Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bu araĢtırmanın amacı, yönetim kurulu çeĢitliliği ve kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk (KSS) söylemleri arasındaki iliĢkide faaliyet gösterilen ülkeye ait kurumsal çevrenin moderatör etkisini ortaya koymaktır. Ġlgili literatür çerçevesinde geliĢtirilen araĢtırma hipotezleri 30 ülkeden seçilen 192 iĢletmeden, nitel ve nicel veri toplama araçları bir arada kullanılarak elde edilen veriler ile test edilmektedir. Elde edilen bulgular, kurulda yer alan kadın üye oranı ve Ph.D. derecesine sahip üye oranı ile KSS arasında pozitif yönlü bir iliĢkiye kanıt sağlarken, MBA derecesine sahip üye oranı için elde edilen iliĢki negatif yönlüdür. Analiz sonuçları YK çeĢitliliği ile KSS arasındaki bu iliĢkilerin kurumsal çevre boyutları olarak ele alınan düzenleyici, normatif ve biliĢsel çevrenin güçlü ve zayıf düzeylerine göre farklılaĢacağını ifade eden moderatör hipotezlere de çeĢitli düzeylerde kanıt sağlamaktadır. The Relationship Between Board Diversity and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosures: The Moderator Effect of Institutional Environment AbstractThe purpose of this study is to examine the moderator effect of the country's institutional environment on the relationship between board diversity and corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosures. The research hypotheses developed in the framework of the related literature are tested by means of data obtained from the administration of both qualitative and quantitative data collection instruments to the 192 business organizations chosen among 30 countries. The findings showed a positive relationship between CSR and the ratio of female members in the board, and the ratio of members with a Ph.D. degree, but the obtained findings for the member rate having MBA was found to be negative. The results of the analysis provide evidences for moderator hypotheses which assert that this relationship between board diversity and CSR differ according to the level of weakness and powerful of regulatory, normative and cognitive environments as corporate environmental dimensions.

show abstract

Building the Business Case for Women Corporate Directors

Cited by 175 publications

References 9 publications

The Composition and Compensation of the Board of Directors as Predictors of Corporate Fraud

The Composition and Compensation of the Board of Directors as Predictors of Corporate Fraud

Women and Employee-Elected Board Members, and Their Contributions to Board Control Tasks

Yönetim kurulu çeşitliliği ve kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk söylemleri arasındaki ilişki: Kurumsal çevrenin moderatör etkisi

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About