2012
DOI: 10.1093/heapro/das063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building social capital as a pathway to success: community development practices of an early childhood intervention program in Canada

Abstract: In the last three decades, various concepts and strategies have been developed to address social determinants of health. This paper brings together the different focuses of health promotion, and demonstrates that effective health intervention programs need to be conducted at multiple levels and fronts. Specifically, based on the evaluation of KidsFirst, an early childhood intervention program in Saskatchewan, Canada, this paper presents the program practices effective in enhancing the social capital and social… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Enhancement of social capital represents an emerging area in social capital and health research (Onyx and Leonard 2010; Ottesen et al 2010; Shan et al 2012; Harris et al 2013). Intervention studies report positive effects of enhancing social capital through organized activities (Michael et al 2008; Ottesen et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enhancement of social capital represents an emerging area in social capital and health research (Onyx and Leonard 2010; Ottesen et al 2010; Shan et al 2012; Harris et al 2013). Intervention studies report positive effects of enhancing social capital through organized activities (Michael et al 2008; Ottesen et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The programme enabled vulnerable families to enhance connectedness among themselves, link them to services and to integrate them in the larger community (Shan, Muhajarine, Loptson, & Jeffery, 2012). Investing in social connectedness is however not a panacea for health and sometimes can facilitate negative or perverse consequences (Kawachi, 2010) such as exclusion of outsiders, intolerance of diversity and restrictions on individual freedoms.…”
Section: Connected Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The programme enabled vulnerable families to enhance connectedness among themselves, link them to services and to integrate them in the larger community (Shan, Muhajarine, Loptson, & Jeffery, 2012). Investing in social connectedness is however not a panacea for health and sometimes can facilitate negative or perverse consequences (Kawachi, 2010) such as exclusion of outsiders, intolerance of diversity and restrictions on individual freedoms.…”
Section: Connected Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%