2019
DOI: 10.1007/164_2019_283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building Robustness into Translational Research

Abstract: Nonclinical studies form the basis for the decision whether to take a therapeutic candidate into the clinic. These studies need to exhibit translational robustness for both ethical and economic reasons. Key findings confirmed in multiple species have a greater chance to also occur in humans. Given the heterogeneity of patient populations, preclinical studies or at least programs comprising multiple studies need to reflect such heterogeneity, e.g., regarding strains, sex, age, and comorbidities of experimental … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we present the recommendations established by the GOT-IT group, which aim to: enhance awareness of key aspects of target validation and assessment; assist in prioritizing activities for efficient use of resources; help to define project-specific value inflexion points, key activities and milestones relevant for decision-making at an early stage; and support the creation of an attractive data package as the foundation to reach the project goals. Importantly, guidance is also presented on data robustness 34 and reproducibility, thereby increasing confidence in the potential of a target and facilitating the transition from purely academic research to rigorous drug discovery. After summarizing the conceptual basis of the recommendations, this article focuses on five key areas of target assessment in which they are applied, concluding with a discussion of key issues in the application of the recommendations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we present the recommendations established by the GOT-IT group, which aim to: enhance awareness of key aspects of target validation and assessment; assist in prioritizing activities for efficient use of resources; help to define project-specific value inflexion points, key activities and milestones relevant for decision-making at an early stage; and support the creation of an attractive data package as the foundation to reach the project goals. Importantly, guidance is also presented on data robustness 34 and reproducibility, thereby increasing confidence in the potential of a target and facilitating the transition from purely academic research to rigorous drug discovery. After summarizing the conceptual basis of the recommendations, this article focuses on five key areas of target assessment in which they are applied, concluding with a discussion of key issues in the application of the recommendations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Female animals are vastly underrepresented in the literature on bladder morphology and function in diabetes ( Arioglu-Inan et al, 2018 ; Ellenbroek et al, 2018 ), which is similar to many other disease areas. Including male and female animals in every study and keeping it powered not only for the main biological comparison but also for a comparison of sexes creates challenges both on resource utilization and ethics of animal use ( Erdogan and Michel, 2020 ). Therefore, our overall research program on diabetes and the urinary bladder was designed to address this in two ways.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, human hypertension can have many causes, whereas animal models typically are mono-causal. Therefore, such animal models have benefits to identify possible pathophysiological mechanisms but may have modest translational value ( Erdogan and Michel, 2020 ). Our pathophysiological baseline data and treatment outcome findings indicate that the effect sizes presently found are most likely of insufficient magnitude to warrant implications for clinical patient management and probably too small to have implications for the clinical management of OAB or HT patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%