Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Scholarly Web Mining 2017
DOI: 10.1145/3057148.3057152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building recommender systems for scholarly information

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They require as input exactly one reference string per line (e.g. ParsCit [4]). Extracting candidate citations with exactly one citation per line is challenging, as many tools that extract text from formats such as PDF either preserve hard line breaks, or attempt to wrap the text, which works well for running paragraphs, but tends to glom multiple citations together (e.g.…”
Section: Related Work and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They require as input exactly one reference string per line (e.g. ParsCit [4]). Extracting candidate citations with exactly one citation per line is challenging, as many tools that extract text from formats such as PDF either preserve hard line breaks, or attempt to wrap the text, which works well for running paragraphs, but tends to glom multiple citations together (e.g.…”
Section: Related Work and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With over 1 million papers published each year [2] and an estimated 10% year on year increase in the annual number of these outputs [3], researchers need tools to help them decide what to read. While recommendation systems for academic papers, such as those provided by Google Scholar, Mendeley Suggest [4] or CORE [5,6] have been created to address the problem of discovering relevant literature, more can be done to help users to effectively navigate through the network of scientific papers. One traditional yet effective way of discovering new and relevant content is by following the edges of the citation graph in the opposite direction, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the publication time awareness, while the concept of time has previously used in RS to better define and delimit long-term vs. short-term user preferences [13], and to suggest papers to users with no previous activity (i.e., new users) [15], [16]. To the best of our knowledge, only [12] has addressed the problem of recommending the most recently published scientific work (i.e., new papers).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current platform partner of Mr. DLib is the reference-management software JabRef [23,24]. The current research partner of Mr. DLib is CORE [25][26][27]. Mr. DLib acts as an intermediate between these partners.…”
Section: Mr Dlib's Scholarly Living Labmentioning
confidence: 99%