Building on the Foundation of General Strain Theory: Specifying the Types of Strain Most Likely to Lead to Crime and Delinquency

Abstract

General strain theory (GST) is usually tested by examining the effect of strain on crime. Researchers, however, have little guidance when it comes to selecting among the many hundreds of types of strain and have trouble explaining why only some of them are related to crime. This article builds on GST by describing the characteristics of strainful events and conditions that influence their relationship to crime. Strains are said to be most likely to result in crime when they (1) are seen as unjust, (2) are seen as high in magnitude, (3) are associated with low social control, and (4) create some pressure or incentive to engage in criminal coping. Drawing on these characteristics, it is predicted that some types of strain will not be related to crime, including types that have dominated the research on strain theory, and that others will be related to crime, including types that have been neglected by empirical researchers.

Gender moderates the association between polyvictimization and suicidal ideation among adolescents in the United Arab Emirates

“…The relationship between victimization and suicidal ideation could be explained by the General Strain Theory. This theory postulates that a strain (relationship or event) would lead adolescents to engage in internalizing forms of deviant behavior such as self-injurious thoughts to manage negative affect (Agnew, 2001;Nock, Prinstein, & Sterba, 2009). …”

Beyond Crime Statistics: The Construction and Application of a Criminogenity Monitor in Amsterdam

“…Enduring tensions and conflicts between spouses clearly obstruct the effective upbringing of their progeny. Moreover, divorces commonly result in single parent families, a risk factor discussed above, as broken homes and emotional traumas may engender grave misbehaviour and breaches of order by the children (Agnew 2001;Sampson and Laub 1990). Policy-makers and other public professionals have no means by which they can interfere in such personal matters as love, marriage and divorce (and encouragement to stay together is not necessarily the best option).…”

Civic stratification and crime. A comparison of asylum migrants with different legal statuses

“…A central assumption underlying the present analysis is that the relationship between civic status and crime cannot be understood without paying attention to strain theory [34,35]. Due to their privileged civic status, naturalized immigrants and residence permit holders will, on average, experience less relative deprivation than asylum seekers in the procedure, who in turn will experience less relative deprivation than those who have become unauthorized residents.…”