2018
DOI: 10.1063/1.5024558
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building machine learning force fields for nanoclusters

Abstract: We assess Gaussian process (GP) regression as a technique to model interatomic forces in metal nanoclusters by analyzing the performance of 2-body, 3-body, and many-body kernel functions on a set of 19-atom Ni cluster structures. We find that 2-body GP kernels fail to provide faithful force estimates, despite succeeding in bulk Ni systems. However, both 3- and many-body kernels predict forces within an ∼0.1 eV/Å average error even for small training datasets and achieve high accuracy even on out-of-sample, hig… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent review of applications of high-dimensional neural neural network potentials [430] summarized the notable number of molecular and materials systems studied, which ranges from simple semiconductors such as silicon [233,431,432] and ZnO [433], to more complex systems such as water and metallic clusters [434], molecules [435][436][437], surfaces [438,439], and liquid/solid interfaces [414,440]. Force fields for nanoclusters have been developed with 2-, 3-, and many-body descriptors [441], and the hydrogen adsorption on nanoclusters was described with structural descriptors such as SOAP [442].…”
Section: Discovery Energies and Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent review of applications of high-dimensional neural neural network potentials [430] summarized the notable number of molecular and materials systems studied, which ranges from simple semiconductors such as silicon [233,431,432] and ZnO [433], to more complex systems such as water and metallic clusters [434], molecules [435][436][437], surfaces [438,439], and liquid/solid interfaces [414,440]. Force fields for nanoclusters have been developed with 2-, 3-, and many-body descriptors [441], and the hydrogen adsorption on nanoclusters was described with structural descriptors such as SOAP [442].…”
Section: Discovery Energies and Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since the scaling is only linear, the GP model remains orders of magnitude faster than computing forces by direct DFT calculations even for the largest database used in this work (N = 320 points). These results (as well as those of many recent works on the construction of ML force fields for a variety of materials [30,31,[56][57][58]) suggest that the production of data-driven force fields could allow for a drastic reduction of computational effort while maintaining QM accuracy. However, when simulating nonequilibrium chemomechanical phenomena, training a ML force field "once and for all" before the simulation is carried out will often not represent a sufficiently good strategy, since the system is likely to explore regions of configuration space not well represented in the initial training database.…”
Section: B Gaussian Process Regression For Bulk Metalsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Metallic nanoclusters are important in many areas of chemistry, but realistic simulations are limited by the computational cost of DFT-MD. Zeni et al 45 study such systems via classical n-body potentials derived from ML ("M-FFs") by constructing n-body kernels that can be exactly mapped to non-parametric classical potential forms such as 3D splines. This circumvents summing over training set entries for predictions, accelerating simulations by orders of magnitude.…”
Section: B Interatomic Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 99%