Innovations and Advances in Computer Sciences and Engineering 2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-3658-2_101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building Information Modeling and Interoperability with Environmental Simulation Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The benefits of adopting BIM are limited by the lack of interoperability between software solutions (Ferrari et al 2010), e.g. due to manual re-input of data.…”
Section: Parametric and Semantically-rich Bim Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benefits of adopting BIM are limited by the lack of interoperability between software solutions (Ferrari et al 2010), e.g. due to manual re-input of data.…”
Section: Parametric and Semantically-rich Bim Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional issues being faced by design teams suggest the lack of a simple method to change the BIM model to meet the required building performance from the energy simulation results. Greater integration is needed to allow precise elements to be highlighted that require modification in order for the criteria to be met on the next performance assessment [28].…”
Section: Issues Faced By Design Teams Using Bim Based Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The as-built BIM models should include data related to anomalies, damage and performance, which is even less common because in practice much of the data resides in accompanying documents (Dossick and Neff, 2010). Moreover, lack of interoperability between software solutions and difficulties in exchanging information limit the benefits of adopting the BIM approach (Ferrari et al, 2010), and the existing standard data models are not sufficient to describe fully infrastructure assets and structural monitoring systems (Davila Delgado et al, 2015;Gerrish et al, 2015;Smarsly and Tauscher, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%