2020
DOI: 10.5194/nhess-20-2647-2020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building hazard maps with differentiated risk perception for flood impact assessment

Abstract: Abstract. In operational flood risk management, a single best model is used to assess the impact of flooding, which might misrepresent uncertainties in the modelling process. We have used quantified uncertainties in flood forecasting to generate flood hazard maps that were combined based on different exceedance probability scenarios. The purpose is to differentiate the impacts of flooding depending on the building use, enabling, therefore, more flexibility for stakeholders' variable risk perception profiles. T… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(77 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Years of economic development and infrastructural assets are washed off with every flooding event, particularly in the developing countries of Southeast Asia, such as India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh [59][60][61][62][63]. The difference between the developed and developing worlds in the case of managing floods lies in their complex differential socioeconomic setups [64][65][66][67][68]. Moreover, many disasters are localized in nature having a lesser spatial extent of the damage.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Years of economic development and infrastructural assets are washed off with every flooding event, particularly in the developing countries of Southeast Asia, such as India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh [59][60][61][62][63]. The difference between the developed and developing worlds in the case of managing floods lies in their complex differential socioeconomic setups [64][65][66][67][68]. Moreover, many disasters are localized in nature having a lesser spatial extent of the damage.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One-dimensional hydrodynamic simulation can competently identify the river risks, but the impacts of embankment b reach is ignored. The river flood will spread along the breach and inundate the depressions in the basin [47]. Thus, this paper further couples the one-dimension and two-dimension models by using the Mike Flood model to analyze the dynamic flood process using indicators with submerged depth, submerged area and arrival time, and identify the risk in the watershed.…”
Section: Processes and Risks Of Flood In River Under Exceeding Contro...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…River flood evolution can be described by a one-dimensional hydrodynamic model, and flood evolution in the floodplain can be simulated by a two-dimensional hydrodynamic model. After obtaining the flood process by simulation, the flood arrival time, submerged area, submerged depth, people, road network, socio-economic and other key elements are imported into GIS to describe the flood risk and generate the contingency plan [47,48].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other authors considered additional uncertainties in flood hazard by including extreme value statistics [19][20][21], in many cases, by relating the changes in rainfall or flow results that may occur as a result of climate change (e.g., [22][23][24][25][26]). The importance of an uncertainty analysis in flood risk management was pointed out previously [7,27] in order to understand the implications for decision makers of limited data availability, model uncertainties, or other uncertainty sources. Monte Carlo simulations (MC) as a technique to reduce uncertainty in flood hazard analyses have been widely used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monte Carlo simulations (MC) as a technique to reduce uncertainty in flood hazard analyses have been widely used. Previous studies have used MC methods (e.g., [15,17,19,[27][28][29]) to analyse all variables: surface roughness, boundary conditions, and return period as flow frequency variable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%