2021
DOI: 10.5610/jaee.21.5_98
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building Fragility Curves Based on Disaster-Victim Certificate Data of Multiple Local Governments Covering a Wide Range of Seismic Motion in the 2016 Kumamoto Earthquake

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Utilizing the methods proposed by Hirokawa and Osaragi [52], we obtained disaster simulation data, including the probabilities of building collapse, street blockage, and fire outbreak. It is important to note that the parameters used for estimating building collapse probabilities are derived from the research conducted after the 2016 Kumamoto Earthquake and the 1995 Great Hanshin Earthquake [53], which are considered to be more accurate than previous studies. By employing these methods, we obtained probabilities of building collapse, road blockage, and fire spread as depicted in Figures 5-7.…”
Section: Data Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Utilizing the methods proposed by Hirokawa and Osaragi [52], we obtained disaster simulation data, including the probabilities of building collapse, street blockage, and fire outbreak. It is important to note that the parameters used for estimating building collapse probabilities are derived from the research conducted after the 2016 Kumamoto Earthquake and the 1995 Great Hanshin Earthquake [53], which are considered to be more accurate than previous studies. By employing these methods, we obtained probabilities of building collapse, road blockage, and fire spread as depicted in Figures 5-7.…”
Section: Data Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%