2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.09.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building Excitatory and Inhibitory Synapses: Balancing Neuroligin Partnerships

Abstract: Processing of neural information is thought to occur by integration of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic inputs. As such, precise control mechanisms must exist to maintain an appropriate balance between each synapse type. Recent findings indicate that neuroligins and their synaptic binding partners modulate the development of both excitatory and inhibitory synapses. Here we highlight these findings and discuss a mechanism potentially involved in controlling the balance between excitation and inhibition.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
99
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
99
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Different affinities of the interactions between different neurexin-neuroligin pairs are combined with a selective linkage to components of glutamatergic versus GABAergic synapses, by mechanisms that are not yet understood. However, the significance of such a shared system is that alterations in stoichiometry of key players can be used to regulate the balance of excitatory and inhibitory inputs onto a neuron [40]. Recent in vivo studies indicate that neurexins and neuroligins have essential roles in synapse development -not in initial adhesion, but in recruitment of molecular components and maturation [47••].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different affinities of the interactions between different neurexin-neuroligin pairs are combined with a selective linkage to components of glutamatergic versus GABAergic synapses, by mechanisms that are not yet understood. However, the significance of such a shared system is that alterations in stoichiometry of key players can be used to regulate the balance of excitatory and inhibitory inputs onto a neuron [40]. Recent in vivo studies indicate that neurexins and neuroligins have essential roles in synapse development -not in initial adhesion, but in recruitment of molecular components and maturation [47••].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selective localization of NL1 and NL2 at excitatory and inhibitory synapses, respectively (11,13), has lead to the idea that these adhesion molecules may contribute to specify distinct types of synapse in an activity-dependent manner (15,16). Two potential mechanisms have been proposed to explain the synapse-specific localization of NLs: (1) intracellular interactions with scaffolding molecules or other postsynaptic proteins may recruit different NL isoforms to glutamatergic or GABAergic synapses (15); (2) synapse specificity may arise from selective extracellular interactions between distinct NL-neurexin isoform pairs (17,18).…”
Section: Synaptic Clustering Of Nl2 Is Independent Of Gaba a Receptormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, NL1 is targeted to glutamatergic synapses (13,14), suggesting that different NLs may play an important role in specifying distinct types of synapse and in determining a balance between neuronal excitation and inhibition (15,16). The mechanisms responsible for the differential targeting of NL1 to glutamatergic synapses and NL2 to GABAergic synapses are unclear, although there is evidence that such specificity could arise either from intracellular interactions with postsynaptic scaffolds (15) or from selective extracellular binding of NL splice variants with neurexin isoforms (17,18). However, the binding partners of NL2 at GABA synapses are not known.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates that the balance of expression of distinct NLG-1 isoforms could underpin the generation of different postsynaptic identities. This study indicates how the dynamic splicing of a single gene in C. elegans nervous system might allow something of the synaptic diversity that the vertebrate neuroligins achieve through segregating function to distinct members of a multiple gene family (Chubykin et al, 2007;Levinson and El-Husseini, 2005;Mackowiak et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%