1999
DOI: 10.1080/096132199369354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building environmental assessment methods: clarifying intentions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
106
0
10

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 208 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
106
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, globally, buildings could consume 16% of the water and indirectly produce nearly 70% of all sulfur oxides [6]. The pressures of sustainable development in the building and construction sectors have become an emerging issue across the world and include the improvement of construction practices and green innovations, such as ecological construction, green building, recycling and eco building materials, in order to minimize their environmental impacts [7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. However, the building and construction industries have been blamed for issues in technological innovations, quality and sustainability with inadequate market competition and governmental policies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, globally, buildings could consume 16% of the water and indirectly produce nearly 70% of all sulfur oxides [6]. The pressures of sustainable development in the building and construction sectors have become an emerging issue across the world and include the improvement of construction practices and green innovations, such as ecological construction, green building, recycling and eco building materials, in order to minimize their environmental impacts [7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. However, the building and construction industries have been blamed for issues in technological innovations, quality and sustainability with inadequate market competition and governmental policies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the literature, it was found that there are many sustainability reporting tools (SRTs) available in the market to gauge the level of sustainability of buildings/infrastructure (Cole, 1999;Crawley and Aho, 1999;Siew et al, 2013;Siew, 2014aSiew, , 2014b. The use of SRTs demonstrates the commitment of building owners and operators towards their environmental responsibility and permits staying ahead of future regulations.…”
Section: Sustainability Reporting Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of SRTs demonstrates the commitment of building owners and operators towards their environmental responsibility and permits staying ahead of future regulations. Cole (1999) argues that the definition of building performance varies according the different interest of parties involved in building development. For example, a building owner would perceive the performance of a building from a cost efficiency perspective whereas occupants will be more concerned about indoor air quality, comfort, health and safety issues.…”
Section: Sustainability Reporting Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, weightings should not be based on whether air pollution is more important than land pollution but instead on which of these aspect exerts a greater specific potential impact on the environment as a point of concern. As the relationships between buildings/building components and their associated sustainability impacts keep advancing through research and requisite data collection, it will become possible to establish reliable guides to assist users to apply weighting protocols to assessment criteria and to meaningfully interpret aggregated results [73].…”
Section: Relevance Of Prototypementioning
confidence: 99%