2010
DOI: 10.2172/988600
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building Energy Simulation Test for Existing Homes (BESTEST-EX); Phase 1 Test Procedure: Building Thermal Fabric Cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• B-EX-Calibration-BaseCase-Utility-Data.xls: Electronic version of utility energy consumption data for use with the calibration test cases, presented in Judkoff et al (2010a), Section 1.3.1.2.…”
Section: The Following Files Provided Within B-ex-phase-1-ref-c-resumentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…• B-EX-Calibration-BaseCase-Utility-Data.xls: Electronic version of utility energy consumption data for use with the calibration test cases, presented in Judkoff et al (2010a), Section 1.3.1.2.…”
Section: The Following Files Provided Within B-ex-phase-1-ref-c-resumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The example acceptance criteria presented in Judkoff et al (2010b) are applied to the physics and calibration tests results. Use BESTEST-EX-Phase-1-Output.xls (Judkoff et al 2010a) to enter simulation results for the program being tested.…”
Section: The Following Files Provided Within B-ex-phase-1-ref-c-resumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the "-C" cases, explicit inputs are randomly selected within the approximate input ranges to generate utility bills using the reference simulation programs; tested software tools are allowed to apply calibration given the reference utility billing data and approximate input ranges (selected explicit inputs used for the reference simulations remain hidden to allow for blind testing). Because the "-C" cases apply approximate input ranges (known uncertainty) for selected inputs, and because some base-case scenarios (see Judkoff et al 2010, Section 1.3.1.2) can have randomly selected reference explicit inputs that are more difficult to estimate from calibration than others, the acceptance criteria for the "-C" cases should be less strict than that for the "-P" cases. Therefore, the following example acceptance criteria are provided:…”
Section: Bestest-ex Acceptance Criteria Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This document provides an example procedure for establishing acceptance-range criteria to assess results from software undergoing BESTEST-EX (Judkoff et al 2010). This example method for BESTEST-EX is a modified version of the method described in HERS BESTEST (Judkoff and Neymark 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This document provides an example procedure for establishing acceptance-range criteria to assess results from software undergoing BESTEST-EX (Judkoff et al 2010). This example method for BESTEST-EX is a modified version of the method described in HERS BESTEST (Judkoff and Neymark 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%