2014
DOI: 10.1080/03004430.2014.908864
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building early relationships: a review of caregiver–child interaction interventions for use in community-based early childhood programmes

Abstract: Children's early relationships with their caregivers are important for later developmental outcomes, both proximally and distally, and enhanced caregiverchild relationships may promote positive outcomes at both the individual and family levels. In this article, we review six evidence-based caregiver-child interaction interventions that can be translated for use by staff in community-based early childhood programmes serving children between the ages of birth and five years. Early childhood programmes selecting … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some researchers have even asserted that relationships are the curriculum (e.g., Deynoot‐Schaub & Riksen‐Walraven, ) because early childhood professionals use their relationships with children as a tool for the provision of optimal learning experiences (Brebner, Hammond, Schaumloffel, & Lind, ). When these relationships are healthy and emotionally supportive, they tend to result in positive developmental outcomes and operate as a protective factor for children (e.g., Ereky‐Stevens, Funder, Katschnig, Malmberg, & Datler, ; Garner & Waajid, ; Vu, Hustedt, Pinder, & Han, ). As one example, positive and stable caregiver–child relationships may safeguard against young children's overarousal and dysregulation and set the stage for growth in self‐regulation and affect tolerance (Feldman & Vengrober, ).…”
Section: Relationship‐buildingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers have even asserted that relationships are the curriculum (e.g., Deynoot‐Schaub & Riksen‐Walraven, ) because early childhood professionals use their relationships with children as a tool for the provision of optimal learning experiences (Brebner, Hammond, Schaumloffel, & Lind, ). When these relationships are healthy and emotionally supportive, they tend to result in positive developmental outcomes and operate as a protective factor for children (e.g., Ereky‐Stevens, Funder, Katschnig, Malmberg, & Datler, ; Garner & Waajid, ; Vu, Hustedt, Pinder, & Han, ). As one example, positive and stable caregiver–child relationships may safeguard against young children's overarousal and dysregulation and set the stage for growth in self‐regulation and affect tolerance (Feldman & Vengrober, ).…”
Section: Relationship‐buildingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As part of an applied research study using family capacity-building help giving practice to promote parents' use of interest-based everyday activities for child language learning, the use of capacity-building practices by early childhood practitioners were related to both parents' fidelity of use of the practices [296] and indirectly related to child language learning mediated by parents' use of the interventions practices with fidelity [95]. Results from a number of research syntheses include evidence for similar pathways of influence [55,134,292,297]. The results, taken together, indicate that family capacity-building practices that support and reinforce parenting confidence and competence are important for parents' use of practices strengthening parent-child relationships and promoting child learning and development [292,298].…”
Section: Family Capacity-building Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These types of implementation practices have been found to be effective in terms of promoting practitioner and parents' use of development-enhancing interactional practices; for example, [246,297,315,317,318,336,339,340].…”
Section: Interactional Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reviews included descriptions of one or more characteristics of a practice constituting the focus of a research synthesis and the outcomes of interest to the investigators. The different reviews included either only one type of study (e.g., Shields, Pratt, & Hunter, 2006 ;Vu, Hustedt, Pinder, & Han, 2014 ) or two or more types of studies (e.g., Campbell, Milbourne, Dugan, & Wilcox, 2006 ;Korfmacher et al, 2008 ). The nature of the evidence for the relationship between the practice characteristics and study outcomes differs, but each synthesis nonetheless includes information that can be used to identify which characteristics for a practice "stand out" as most important in terms of implications for practice.…”
Section: Narrative Reviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%