2007
DOI: 10.4324/9780080466989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building Cost Planning for the Design Team

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The significance of this study was ascertained by comparing the literature review findings with study findings. Smith and Jagger (2007), Ibrahim (2007), Parasonis et al (2012) and Brkljac et al (2015) extensively discussed building morphology factors. This study identified six building morphology factors from the literature, all of which were endorsed by the interviewees.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The significance of this study was ascertained by comparing the literature review findings with study findings. Smith and Jagger (2007), Ibrahim (2007), Parasonis et al (2012) and Brkljac et al (2015) extensively discussed building morphology factors. This study identified six building morphology factors from the literature, all of which were endorsed by the interviewees.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, by properly determining the geometry of the building based on its location and expected function, a substantial reduction of the operational and energy costs can be achieved (Khamma and Boubekri, 2017). According to Seeley (1996), Ashworth (2004), Smith and Jagger (2007), Kirkham (2007) and Cartlidge (2013), plan shape, size, wall-to-floor ratio, circulation space, story height, total building height and grouping are the principle morphological factors that influence the cost of building works.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, clients expect the quantity surveyor to maintain rigorous cost control during project execution in order to deliver the project within budget. Designing to achieve such cost may result in excessive running and maintenance costs later on [39,40].…”
Section: Client Expectations On Quality Project Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%