Building contingency planning for closed‐loop supply chains with product recovery

Abstract

Contingency planning is the first stage in developing a formal set of production planning and control activities for the reuse of products obtained via return flows in a closed‐loop supply chain. The paper takes a contingency approach to explore the factors that impact production planning and control for closed‐loop supply chains that incorporate product recovery. A series of three cases are presented, and a framework developed that shows the common activities required for all remanufacturing operations. To build on the similarities and illustrate and integrate the differences in closed‐loop supply chains, Hayes and Wheelwright’s product–process matrix is used as a foundation to examine the three cases representing Remanufacture‐to‐Stock (RMTS), Reassemble‐to‐Order (RATO), and Remanufacture‐to‐Order (RMTO). These three cases offer end‐points and an intermediate point for closed‐loop supply operations. Since they represent different positions on the matrix, characteristics such as returns volume, timing, quality, product complexity, test and evaluation complexity, and remanufacturing complexity are explored. With a contingency theory for closed‐loop supply chains that incorporate product recovery in place, past cases can now be reexamined and the potential for generalizability of the approach to similar types of other problems and applications can be assessed and determined.

An Analysis of Bookkeeping Practises of Micro-Entrepreneurs in the Retail Clothing Industry in Cape Town, South Africa

“…The Cronbach's Alpha coefficient's of 'Micro-entrepreneurs' bookkeeping execution practices' is 0.893 greater than 0.707 which; Nunnaly [69], Peterson [70], Gliem [71] explains that the variable items on the five-point Likert-scale used are reliable. [72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85].…”

An Exploration of Methods to Improve Process Flow in a Remanufacturing Cell

“…Many operations involved in remanufacturing have tried to use traditional planning approaches but these have been left wanting as the planning requirements of a remanufacturing operation are unique (Guide, Jayaraman and Linton, 2003). As a result of this, organisations attempting to use a one size fits all approach to planning and scheduling of work in a remanufacturing context were highly likely to fail.…”

“…When adopting a contingency approach to a remanufacturing operation it is essential that the planners build the operation to suit the rate of arrival of returned product and the type of remanufacturing operation that is to take place, i.e. remanufacture to order, reassemble to order or remanufacture to stock (Guide, Jayaraman and Linton, 2003).…”

An Overview of Used-Products Remanufacturing

“…The automotive sector particularly has a strong and long history of remanufacturing (Seitz, 2007;Golinska, & Kawa, 2011) where the alternator has the highest remanufacturing rate (Schau, Traverso, & Finkbeiner, 2012). Remanufacturing is also gaining scientific significance in a variety of industries that include single use-devices for hospitals, such as wheelchairs and hearing aids (Srivastava, 2004) cellular phones (Guide Jr, Jayaraman, & Linton, 2003b) and truck tyres (Lebreton & Tuma, 2006). The diverse nature of remanufactured products together with different degrees of remanufacturing efforts creates a variety of applications (Zikopoulos, 2012).…”