“…An additional problem with most authorship guidelines and criteria is the reference to "substantial contributions", leaving a sizeable amount of room for interpretation (Borenstein & Shamoo, 2015;Teixeira Da Silva & Dobránszki, 2016a) in which researchers tend to overestimate the importance of their own contribution (Hosseini & Gordijn, 2020). Reaching agreement can be especially challenging for multicenter studies when large numbers of investigators and contributors are involved, which is why Carfagno et al (2022) have drafted criteria to delineate "substantial" contributions in industrysponsored research in the biomedical sciences. Arguably, it may be recommended to transition from authorship to contributorship (Borenstein & Shamoo, 2015;Holcombe, 2019;Hosseini & Gordijn, 2020;Pruschak & Hopp, 2022), echoing an argument already made in 1997 (Rennie et al, 1997) and clearly formulated by Resnik: "scientists should more clearly define the responsibilities and contributions of members of research teams and should distinguish between different roles, such as author, statistician, technician, grant writer, data collector, and so forth" (Resnik, 1997, p. 237).…”