2015
DOI: 10.1080/13549839.2015.1100597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building community resilience: can everyone enjoy a good life?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Verbal and informal mechanisms are some of the most powerful means of transmitting messages on climate change [47,48]. Recent studies suggest that this is best achieved when issues directly relevant to communities are linked to climate change, such as on improving quality of life and the capacity of neighbourhoods to recover from threats and respond to change [49]. Approaches that use a locality to help people connect to emotions and social meanings associated with climate impacts may be particularly fruitful [45,50].…”
Section: Build Narratives About Climate Changementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Verbal and informal mechanisms are some of the most powerful means of transmitting messages on climate change [47,48]. Recent studies suggest that this is best achieved when issues directly relevant to communities are linked to climate change, such as on improving quality of life and the capacity of neighbourhoods to recover from threats and respond to change [49]. Approaches that use a locality to help people connect to emotions and social meanings associated with climate impacts may be particularly fruitful [45,50].…”
Section: Build Narratives About Climate Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resilience is increasingly viewed less as an outcome and more as a process of engagement, action, and change [35], involving participation and empowerment through working with social relationships, strengthening institutions and working with human desires and capacities in a context where politics and power matter [49,57,60]. In simple terms, 'participation' involves enhancing both ownership and responsibility for action through processes that motivate and address power imbalances that constrain participants of change [61,62].…”
Section: Focus On Processes and Pathwaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For an illustrative example in the area of community development see Blackman, Buick & O'Flynn (2016). Positive outcomes from asset-based approaches are evident in relation to poverty alleviation (Ennis & West, 2013;Toth, 2015;Wu & Pearce, 2014); access and equality in education (Knight, 2014;McNamara Horvat & Earl Davis, 2011;Samuelson & Litzler, 2016); community resilience (Cinderby, Haq, Cambridge, & Lock, 2016;Paul & Vogl, 2013); and youth development (Bloomberg, Ganey, Alba, Quintero, & Alcantara, 2003;Theron & Malindi, 2010). In the domain of health there has been increasing interest in deploying an asset-based approach over the last decade, particularly in the areas of public and mental health (Boyd, Hayes, Wilson, & Bearsley-Smith, 2008;Morgan & Ziglio, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social skills are also identified with social capital. In its narrow interpretation, social capital refers to the individual' social relations and connections, and his/her sense of trust and safety in the community (Cinderby et al 2015;Duff 2011;Schaefer et al 2015). However, for some, social capital broadly includes also structural conditions, such as actors' access to information and services, as well as cognitive resources shared among different actors (Battilana et al 2009;Mair and Marti' 2006).…”
Section: Enabling Resources: An Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certain literature includes also a cognitive element as part of the structural context, namely shared meanings, values, and norms that may affect initiatives' success or failure (Mair and Marti' 2006;Westley et al 2013). Papers dealing with context embeddedness also stress the importance of material resources, mostly financial and built capitals, that entrepreneurs leverage in their structural context of action (Cinderby et al 2015;Johnstone and Lionais 2006;Kessler and Frank 2009). Spatial elements, for a long time dismissed in studies of institutional entrepreneurship (Korsgaard et al 2015), are also considered, including the topographical, geographical and infrastructural characteristics of the place in which entrepreneurs operate (McKeever et al 2015;Schaefer et al 2015).…”
Section: Enabling Resources: An Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%