Building Community Participatory Research Coalitions from the Ground Up: The Philadelphia Area Research Community Coalition

Johnson, Jerry; Hayden, U. Tara; Thomas, Nicole A.; Groce-Martin, Jennine; Henry, Thomas C.; Guerra, Terry; Walker, Alia; West, William F.; Barnett, Marina; Kumanyika, Shiriki

doi:10.1353/cpr.0.0052

Cited by 17 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Partners who are committed to the partnership and its work and share power, risk, responsibility, and accountability create the atmosphere and support for positive collaborations that facilitate long-term partnerships (Baquet, Bromwell, Hall, & Frego., 2013; Ferré, Jones, Norris, & Rowley, 2010; Pivik & Goelman, 2011). Individual partner characteristics identified also indicated that they be representative and appropriate to the partnership’s work such that they bring their unique skills, expertise, and perspectives to all aspects of the partnership’s research (Ferré et al, 2010; Goold et al, 2016; Johnson et al, 2009; Pivik & Goelman, 2011). In addition, such partners need to be able to make decisions on behalf of the organizations they represent (Baquet, 2012; Hicks et al, 2012) and actively engage at all levels of partnership work to ensure that community needs and goals are prioritized (Chino, 2012; Goodman et al, 2017; Morales et al, 2016).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Success in Long-Standing Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) Partnerships: A Scoping Literature Review

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is increasingly used by community and academic partners to examine health inequities and promote health equity in communities. Despite increasing numbers of CBPR partnerships, there is a lack of consensus in the field regarding what defines partnership success and how to measure factors contributing to success in long-standing CBPR partnerships. Aims. To identify indicators and measures of success in long-standing CBPR partnerships as part of a larger study whose aim is to develop and validate an instrument measuring success across CBPR partnerships. Methods. The Joanna Briggs Institute framework and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guided searches of three databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus) for articles published between 2007 and 2017 and evaluating success in CBPR partnerships existing longer than 4 years. Results. Twenty-six articles met search criteria. We identified 3 key domains and 7 subdomains with 28 underlying indicators of success. Six partnerships developed or used instruments to measure their success; only one included reliability or validity data. Discussion. CBPR partnerships reported numerous intersecting partner, partnership, and outcome indicators important for success. These results, along with data from key informant interviews with community and academic partners and advisement from a national panel of CBPR experts, will inform development of items for an instrument measuring CBPR partnership success. Conclusion. The development of a validated instrument measuring indicators of success will allow long-standing CBPR partnerships to evaluate their work toward achieving health equity and provide a tool for newly forming CBPR partnerships aiming to achieve long-term success.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Success in Long-Standing Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) Partnerships: A Scoping Literature Review

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Coalition or partnership development is context dependent (Kegler, Rigler, & Honeycutt, 2010). Consequently, we recommend that each PH-PBRN examine the CBPR literature, which is replete with tools, examples, and lessons learned for partnership development from which they may benefit (Andrews, Cox, Newman, & Meadows, 2011; Becker, Israel, & Allen, 2005; Fawcett, Schultz, Watson-Thompson, Fox, & Bremby, 2010; Israel, Lichtenstein, et al, 2001; Johnson et al, 2009; KU Work Group for Community Health and Development, 2016; Lewis et al, 2016).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Applying Community-Based Participatory Research Partnership Principles to Public Health Practice-Based Research Networks

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With real-world relevance and translatability as important goals, applied methodological approaches have arisen along the participatory continuum that value context and empower stakeholders to partner actively with academics throughout the research process. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) provides the gold standard for equitable, partnered research in traditional communities. Practice-based research networks (PBRNs) also have developed, coalescing communities of practice and of academics to identify, study, and answer practice-relevant questions. To optimize PBRN potential for expanding scientific knowledge, while bridging divides across knowledge production, dissemination, and implementation, we elucidate how PBRN partnerships can be strengthened by applying CBPR principles to build and maintain research collaboratives that empower practice partners. Examining the applicability of CBPR partnership principles to public health (PH) PBRNs, we conclude that PH-PBRNs can serve as authentic, sustainable CBPR partnerships, ensuring the co-production of new knowledge, while also improving and expanding the implementation and impact of research findings in real-world settings.Keywords practice-based research networks (PBRN), community-based participatory research (CBPR), academic-practice partnerships, communities of practice, knowledge co-production

show abstract

“…8 PARCC, organized in 2005, is comprised of about 20 community organizations conducting health related programs in Wests/Southwest Philadelphia, representing many different stakeholders; grassroots, school-based, faith, academic, private nonprofits, and government. PARCC was organized out of the expressed interests of communities in the West/Southwest Philadelphia area to become partners with academic researchers in CBPR.…”

Section: Partnerships In the Pcvpcmentioning

confidence: 99%

Methods for Linking Community Views to Measureable Outcomes in a Youth Violence Prevention Program

McDonald¹,

Richmond²,

Guerra³

et al. 2012

cpr

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background All parties in community–academic partnerships have a vested interest prevention program success. Markers of success that reflect community’s experiences of programmatic prevention success are not always measurable, but critically speak to community-defined needs. Objective The purpose of this manuscript was to (1) describe our systematic process for linking locally relevant community views (community-defined indicators) to measurable outcomes in the context of a youth violence prevention program and (2) discuss lessons learned, next steps, and recommendations for others trying to replicate a similar process. Methods A research team composed of both academic and community researchers conducted a systematic process of matching community-defined indicators of youth violence prevention programmatic success to standardized youth survey items being administered in the course of a program evaluation. The research team of three community partners and Five academic partners considered 43 community-defined indicators and 208 items from the youth surveys being utilized within the context of a community-based aggression prevention program. At the end of the matching process, 92 youth survey items were identified and agreed upon as potential matches to 11 of the community-defined indicators. Conclusions We applied rigorous action steps to match community-defined indicators to survey data collected in the youth violence prevention intervention. We learned important lessons that inform recommendations for others interested in such endeavors. The process used to derive and assess community-defined indicators of success emphasized the principles of community-based participatory research (CBPR) and use of existing and available data to reduce participant burden.

show abstract

Building Community Participatory Research Coalitions from the Ground Up: The Philadelphia Area Research Community Coalition

Cited by 17 publications

References 21 publications

Success in Long-Standing Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) Partnerships: A Scoping Literature Review

Success in Long-Standing Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) Partnerships: A Scoping Literature Review

Applying Community-Based Participatory Research Partnership Principles to Public Health Practice-Based Research Networks

Methods for Linking Community Views to Measureable Outcomes in a Youth Violence Prevention Program

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About