2006
DOI: 10.1080/03085140600960799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building ‘Community’: New Strategies of Governance in Urban China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
142
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 198 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
142
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, where new localists see important opportunities for building cogovernance on a municipal scale, the nature of this possible co-governance is insufficiently specified and the reality looks more like the hierarchical governance perceived by theorists of the first kind; that is, a complex system of multiscalar governance integrated vertically and horizontally through Third Way rescaling strategies as described earlier in this article. Community promotion, as described by DeFilippis et al (2006: 682), invokes 'community' as 'a form of organisation through which ordinary people can mobilise their interests in opposition to those of the state, or of larger global forces' (Bray, 2006: 532; see also Fung and Wright, 2003, on 'countervailing power', and, for examples of such organisation, Kingsnorth, 2003, andWainwright, 2003). Community promotion involves seizing opportunities both for alternative economic development, through a range of forms of co-operative organisation, and for expanded democratic practice, as a result of autonomous community organisations challenging and negotiating with state representatives.…”
Section: Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, where new localists see important opportunities for building cogovernance on a municipal scale, the nature of this possible co-governance is insufficiently specified and the reality looks more like the hierarchical governance perceived by theorists of the first kind; that is, a complex system of multiscalar governance integrated vertically and horizontally through Third Way rescaling strategies as described earlier in this article. Community promotion, as described by DeFilippis et al (2006: 682), invokes 'community' as 'a form of organisation through which ordinary people can mobilise their interests in opposition to those of the state, or of larger global forces' (Bray, 2006: 532; see also Fung and Wright, 2003, on 'countervailing power', and, for examples of such organisation, Kingsnorth, 2003, andWainwright, 2003). Community promotion involves seizing opportunities both for alternative economic development, through a range of forms of co-operative organisation, and for expanded democratic practice, as a result of autonomous community organisations challenging and negotiating with state representatives.…”
Section: Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…An 'information revolution' is leading to ample manifestations of opposition to the status quo (Zhou, 2008), where urban heritage increasingly is at the centre of media attention 1 ; --There is a rising awareness of cultural and other intangible values embedded in historic quarters, especially among professionals (Ruan, 1993) (Bray, 2006), this paper will research how the urban regeneration practices of historic areas can contribute to a general urban planning theory. It will also assess the spatial and social issues underlying the conservation of the historic environment that create contention between different contrasting voices (Pendlebury, 2008 (Spires, 2011).…”
Section: Governance Of Urban Regeneration For Historic Areas In Chinamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The term ÔShe-quÕ refers to a both sociological concept and a geographical concept in Chinese: firstly, it is a demarcated spatial unit with clear geographical boundaries; more importantly, it refers to a street-level administration system (Bray, 2006). In most cities, the two-tier S-R system plays the administrating body of She-qu.…”
Section: She-qumentioning
confidence: 99%