Building Cohesion Across Representations: A Mechanism for STEM Integration

Abstract

Purpose The mechanisms of integration of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) remain largely underspecified in the research and policy literatures, despite their purported benefits. Our novel claim is that one key mechanism of STEM integration is producing and maintaining cohesion of central concepts across the range of representations, objects, activities, and social structures in the engineering classroom. Method We analyze multiviewpoint videos of multiday classroom activities from Project Lead the Way (PLTW) classes in digital electronics in two urban high schools. Results To forge cohesion, teachers use coordination of representations, tools, and materials, and they use projection to reference places and events, past and future. Teachers also perform explicit identification to label central invariant relations that are the conceptual focus of their instruction. Teachers typically perform identification, coordination, and projection on the particular STEM representations used in projects in order to improve the cohesion of the conceptual content of a curriculum unit. Teachers can also represent the larger sequence of project activities within the curriculum to construct a cohesive account of how the various activities and representations relate and build upon key ideas. Conclusions This paper found that cohesion‐producing activities promote student understanding by threading conceptual relations through different mathematical representations, scientific laws, technological objects, engineering designs, learning spaces, and social structures. In these ways, cohesion can promote STEM integration in the engineering classroom.

How Teachers Link Ideas in Mathematics Instruction Using Speech and Gesture: A Corpus Analysis

“…As we have documented, in many cases teachers use gestures and speech to delineate the multiple correspondences that exist between elements of mathematical representations (e.g., individual table entries in Figure 3, parts of numerical representations in Figure 5). Our findings align with other reports that highlight teachers' use of gesture as a means for establishing cohesion among ideas and representations in instructional settings Nathan et al, 2013).…”

STEM literacy or literacies? Examining the empirical basis of these constructs

“…Some studies have compared the similarities and differences in the visual representations used in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (e.g. Nathan et al, 2013;Tang, 2013), but more is needed to further specify the common visual skill set required in STEM literacy.…”

A Novel Paradigm for Engineering Education: Virtual Internships With Individualized Mentoring and Assessment of Engineering Thinking

“…With the increased emphasis on practice-or project-based instruction and transdisciplinary approaches in science education [1,2,[49][50][51][52][53], we must develop tools that enable instructors to pro vide meaningful, realistic engineering experiences without prohibi tive costs, excessive institutional buy-in, or impractical scheduling. Virtual internships address this need, and participation in multiple virtual internships can enhance learning and student interest still more.…”