2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10531-017-1388-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building capacity in biodiversity monitoring at the global scale

Abstract: Human-driven global change is causing ongoing declines in biodiversity worldwide. In order to address these declines, decision-makers need accurate assessments of the status of and pressures on biodiversity. However, these are heavily constrained by incomplete and uneven spatial, temporal and taxonomic coverage. For instance, data from regions such as Europe and North America are currently used overwhelmingly for large-scale biodiversity assessments due to lesser availability of suitable data from other, more … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
71
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 134 publications
0
71
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We then propose and outline a Global Island Monitoring Scheme (GIMS) that is based on permanent forest plots, consistent methods, and selected indicator groups of organisms. Our proposal adds to recent calls for enhanced biodiversity monitoring (Schmeller et al 2017;Stephenson et al 2017;Walters and Scholes 2017) and implies cooperation between environmental agencies responsible for the management of protected areas, and scientists working on the long-term dynamics of biodiversity in native island forests. Our main aim is to propose scientific standards for a global monitoring scheme of spatial and temporal ecological changes in native island forests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We then propose and outline a Global Island Monitoring Scheme (GIMS) that is based on permanent forest plots, consistent methods, and selected indicator groups of organisms. Our proposal adds to recent calls for enhanced biodiversity monitoring (Schmeller et al 2017;Stephenson et al 2017;Walters and Scholes 2017) and implies cooperation between environmental agencies responsible for the management of protected areas, and scientists working on the long-term dynamics of biodiversity in native island forests. Our main aim is to propose scientific standards for a global monitoring scheme of spatial and temporal ecological changes in native island forests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The use of next-generation sequencing approaches led to a boost in data acquisition (Taberlet, Coissac, Pompanon, Brochmann, & Willerslev, 2012) and is considered to make important contributions to biodiversity research (Bohmann et al, 2014;Rees, Maddison, Middleditch, Patmore, & Gough, 2014). eDNA-based metabarcoding may present one of several tools needed to globally coordinate initiatives for ecosystem monitoring and sustainable management (Bush et al, 2017;Schmeller et al, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for conservation biology or invasive species management studies) using data collected by citizens (citizen science, Schmeller et al . ) at a large spatial scale. Depending on the data collected, these models could be extended with an HMM approach to take into account abundance data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, as the field data used in the model were simple presence-absence data, this approach could easily be generalised to investigate data in various other types of ecological systems (e.g. for conservation biology or invasive species management studies) using data collected by citizens (citizen science, Schmeller et al 2017) at a large spatial scale. Depending on the data collected, these models could be extended with an HMM approach to take into account abundance data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%