2015
DOI: 10.1080/18387357.2015.1063972
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building capacity for cross-sectorial approaches to the care of families where a parent has a mental illness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, this was the only component of family-focussed practice measured that was predicted by child-focussed training, even though a significant barrier reported by practitioners is not knowing enough about issues for children and their developmental needs to undertake family-focussed practice (Bibou-Nakou 2003;Dean & Macmillan 2001). This is not unexpected, as other similar studies have reported a lack of practice change in family-focussed practice following education-based or awareness-raising training courses (Goodyear et al 2015b). In the present study, these results indicate that it is important to have an understanding about children and their developmental needs to assess the impact of parental illness, but it is not as important for other domains of family-focussed practice.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, this was the only component of family-focussed practice measured that was predicted by child-focussed training, even though a significant barrier reported by practitioners is not knowing enough about issues for children and their developmental needs to undertake family-focussed practice (Bibou-Nakou 2003;Dean & Macmillan 2001). This is not unexpected, as other similar studies have reported a lack of practice change in family-focussed practice following education-based or awareness-raising training courses (Goodyear et al 2015b). In the present study, these results indicate that it is important to have an understanding about children and their developmental needs to assess the impact of parental illness, but it is not as important for other domains of family-focussed practice.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Despite the promotion of family-focussed practice within mental health services in government policy across several countries, including Australia, Finland, Norway, Ireland, and Canada (Falkov et al 2015;Nicholson et al 2015), promoting the care of families where a parent has a mental illness remains a significant challenge for adult mental health services (Goodyear et al 2015a). Part of the issue is that while the benefits of family-focussed practice in mental health are well established (Goodyear et al 2015a;Hosman et al 2009;Reupert & Maybery 2007), significant translation to practice barriers exist in the adoption of evidence-based family interventions to different sectors (Dixon et al 2001;Goodyear et al 2015b;Kavanagh et al 1993;Lauritzen et al 2014Lauritzen et al , 2015. Nonetheless, various family-focussed practices are undertaken by some adult mental health practitioners (Grant, 2014;Maybery et al 2014), although the reasons why some individual practitioners engage with families within these constraints while others do not is not at present clear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, Goodyear et al . ). Single exposure training models (without ongoing support) or the provision of information alone (through manuals or practically inadequate guidelines for the workforce) are insufficient to promote workforce change (Foster et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Training does exist in this area (e.g. see Foster et al 2011) though ongoing opportunities for supervision, coaching and monitoring are required to sustain practice change in this area (Lauritzen et al 2014b, Goodyear et al 2015b…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, there have been a number of comprehensive reviews of the evidence relating to professional perceptions of collaborative working which consistently identify the three levels of organisational, cultural and interpersonal factors to be relevant (Atkinson et al 2007;Cameron et al 2015;and Sloper 2004). At an organisational level strong leadership with a commitment to drive integrated working is seen as an important to achieve joint working (Mitchell, 2006;Sloper 2006;Goodyear, 2015 andSalveron, 2015). Furthermore, integrated working has been identified as making increased demands on workers and organisations initially and as a result requires adequate and shared resources to achieve changes in practice (Mcculloch et al, 2004;Sloper, 2006 andMitchell, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%